Geophysical Service Inc. v. Encana Corp., 2016 ABQB 49

JudgeStrekaf, J.
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Citation2016 ABQB 49
Date22 January 2016
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
4 practice notes
  • North American Polypropylene ULC v Williams Canada Propylene ULC, 2018 ABQB 281
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 11, 2018
    ...Ventures Ltd v Soost, 2016 ABQB 454 at para 160, aff’d on other gnds, 2017 ABCA 25; Geophysical Service Incorporated v Encana Corporation, 2016 ABQB 49 at para 20 (where the parties agreed that s 254 applied); Commercial Construction Supply Ltd v Ghost Riders Farm Inc, 2016 ABQB 166 at para......
  • Litigious Corporate Plaintiffs Take Note: Large Security For Costs Award For Multiple Defendants
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 7, 2016
    ...corporate plaintiff in deciding whether security for costs is appropriate. In Geophysical Service Incorporated v Encana Corporation, 2016 ABQB 49, the plaintiff appealed 26 orders for security for costs granted in 17 actions commenced by Geophysical Services Incorporated (GSI) amounting to ......
  • Geophysical Service Inc. v. Encana Corp., 2016 ABQB 229
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 21, 2016
    ...are in preparation. [1] Strekaf, J. : This decision addresses costs arising out of my written decision delivered on January 22, 2016 (2016 ABQB 49). Geophysical Service Inc ("GSI") appealed 26 orders for  security for costs granted to various Defendants by a Master on March 1......
  • Bechir v Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP, 2017 ABQB 214
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 27, 2017
    ...allegedly results from the defendant’s actions of which the plaintiff complains: Geophysical Service Incorporated v Encana Corporation, 2016 ABQB 49 at para Therefore, this consideration is relevant to a security for cost application. The Defendants concede that there is threshold merit, as......
3 cases
  • North American Polypropylene ULC v Williams Canada Propylene ULC, 2018 ABQB 281
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 11, 2018
    ...Ventures Ltd v Soost, 2016 ABQB 454 at para 160, aff’d on other gnds, 2017 ABCA 25; Geophysical Service Incorporated v Encana Corporation, 2016 ABQB 49 at para 20 (where the parties agreed that s 254 applied); Commercial Construction Supply Ltd v Ghost Riders Farm Inc, 2016 ABQB 166 at para......
  • Geophysical Service Inc. v. Encana Corp., 2016 ABQB 229
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 21, 2016
    ...are in preparation. [1] Strekaf, J. : This decision addresses costs arising out of my written decision delivered on January 22, 2016 (2016 ABQB 49). Geophysical Service Inc ("GSI") appealed 26 orders for  security for costs granted to various Defendants by a Master on March 1......
  • Bechir v Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP, 2017 ABQB 214
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 27, 2017
    ...allegedly results from the defendant’s actions of which the plaintiff complains: Geophysical Service Incorporated v Encana Corporation, 2016 ABQB 49 at para Therefore, this consideration is relevant to a security for cost application. The Defendants concede that there is threshold merit, as......
1 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT