Al-Ghamdi v Alberta, 2017 ABQB 684
| Judge | Goss |
| Citation | 2017 ABQB 684 |
| Date | 15 November 2017 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Docket Number | 0803 09004, 1404 00667, 1504 00079 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
74 practice notes
-
Civil Claims for Violation of Privacy
...BDC v BJB , 2012 YKSC 64. In Alberta, see Martin v General Team-sters, Local Union No 362 , 2011 ABQB 412; Al-Ghamdi v Alberta , 2017 ABQB 684; Kang v MB , 2019 ABQB 246; but see Carbone , above note 283. See Barbara von Tigerstrom, “Direct and Vicarious Liability for Tort Claims Involving ......
-
Table of cases
...8 Alderville First Nation v Canada, 2017 FC 631 ................................................. 272 Al-Ghamdi v Alberta, 2017 ABQB 684 ................................................................. 99 AM v Ryan, [1997] 1 SCR 157................................................................
-
Kang v MB, 2019 ABQB 246
...SCC 27 and R v Cody, 2017 SCC 31. In a case where the test for striking out a pleading was comprehensively reviewed, Al-Ghamdi v Alberta, 2017 ABQB 684, Goss J stated that “[t]he test for striking out has evolved in accordance with the cultural shift” reflected in Hyrniak (at para 104). She......
-
NEVSUN, ATLANTIC LOTTERY, AND THE IMPLICATIONS OR THE 2020 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA MOTION TO STRIKE DECISIONS ON ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND THE RULE OF LAW.
...Ltd, 2019 ABQB 404, [2019] AJ No 724; Turp v Canada (Minister of Foreign Affairs), 2018 FC 12, [2018] FCJ No 203; Al-Ghamdi v Alberta, 2017 ABQB 684, [2017] AJ No 1218; Nool v Carido, 2016 ONCJ 639, [2016] OJ No 5505; Resolute Forest Products Inc v 2471256 Canada Inc, 2016 ONSC 5398, 133 OR......
Get Started for Free
66 cases
-
Kang v MB, 2019 ABQB 246
...SCC 27 and R v Cody, 2017 SCC 31. In a case where the test for striking out a pleading was comprehensively reviewed, Al-Ghamdi v Alberta, 2017 ABQB 684, Goss J stated that “[t]he test for striking out has evolved in accordance with the cultural shift” reflected in Hyrniak (at para 104). She......
-
Paraniuk v Pierce, 2018 ABQB 1015
...ensure video evidence was lost. [15] The test to strike out a pleading per Rule 3.68 is comprehensively reviewed in Al-Ghamdi v Alberta, 2017 ABQB 684 at paras 101-128. Briefly, the modern approach to Rule 3.68 conducts this process in light of the “culture shift” that courts must provide a......
-
El Sayed v Canada (Minister of Justice and Solicitor General), 2021 ABQB 987
...the Parole Board of Canada Appeal Division. Failure to exhaust administrative processes is an abuse of the Court: Al-Ghamdi v Alberta, 2017 ABQB 684 at paras 126-128, aff’d 2020 ABCA 81, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 39389 (February 5, [50] ......
-
Harun-ar-Rashid v Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), 2019 ABQB 54
...[38] Other cases that support this ratio of Seneca College v Bhadauria and demonstrate its clear application include Al-Ghamdi v Alberta, 2017 ABQB 684 and FRN v Alberta, 2014 ABQB 375, 315 CRR (2d) [39] Accordingly, on the most liberal reading of the Statement of Claim, a tort action for d......
Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
-
Halting Vexatious Litigants In Their Tracks
...Regulatory Group is here to assist regulators with all types of litigation and at every level of Court. Footnote 1 Al-Ghamdi v Alberta, 2017 ABQB 684 at para The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about yo......
-
Halting Vexatious Litigants In Their Tracks
...Regulatory Group is here to assist regulators with all types of litigation and at every level of Court. Footnote 1 Al-Ghamdi v Alberta, 2017 ABQB 684 at para The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about yo......
4 books & journal articles
-
Civil Claims for Violation of Privacy
...BDC v BJB , 2012 YKSC 64. In Alberta, see Martin v General Team-sters, Local Union No 362 , 2011 ABQB 412; Al-Ghamdi v Alberta , 2017 ABQB 684; Kang v MB , 2019 ABQB 246; but see Carbone , above note 283. See Barbara von Tigerstrom, “Direct and Vicarious Liability for Tort Claims Involving ......
-
Table of cases
...8 Alderville First Nation v Canada, 2017 FC 631 ................................................. 272 Al-Ghamdi v Alberta, 2017 ABQB 684 ................................................................. 99 AM v Ryan, [1997] 1 SCR 157................................................................
-
NEVSUN, ATLANTIC LOTTERY, AND THE IMPLICATIONS OR THE 2020 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA MOTION TO STRIKE DECISIONS ON ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND THE RULE OF LAW.
...Ltd, 2019 ABQB 404, [2019] AJ No 724; Turp v Canada (Minister of Foreign Affairs), 2018 FC 12, [2018] FCJ No 203; Al-Ghamdi v Alberta, 2017 ABQB 684, [2017] AJ No 1218; Nool v Carido, 2016 ONCJ 639, [2016] OJ No 5505; Resolute Forest Products Inc v 2471256 Canada Inc, 2016 ONSC 5398, 133 OR......
-
"That Is Not How the Common Law Works": Paths to Tort Liability for Harassment.
...a list of cases from Ontario, Alberta, and British Columbia that tentatively recognized the tort of harassment, see Al-Ghamdi v Alberta, 2017 ABQB 684 at para 137. In denying the existence of previous case law from other jurisdictions, the Merrifield decision actually contradicts itself, as......