Gichuru v. Purewal

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
JudgeBranch
Citation2018 BCSC 2288
Docket NumberS172318
Date14 December 2018

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 practice notes
  • Gichuru v. Community Legal Assistance Society
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 15, 2021
    ...v. Purewal, 2018 BCCA 267 (plaintiff’s appeal from costs award by a chambers judge – heard June 20, 2018) 39. Gichuru v. Purewal, 2018 BCSC 2288 (defendant’s application for security for costs – heard November 30, 40. Gichuru v. Purewal, 2019 BCSC 484 (plaintiff’s petition for judicial ......
  • Scoretz v. Kensam Enterprises Inc.
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 17, 2021
    ...v. General Motors LLC, 2018 BCSC 1886 at paras. 22-24; Meade v. Armstrong (City), 2011 BCCA 63 at para. 12; Gichuru v. Purewal, 2018 BCSC 2288 at paras. 17-24, 55; Ocean Pastures Corporation v. Old Masset Economic Development Corporation, 2016 BCCA 12 at paras. 20-21. [73] The defendants ag......
  • Masjoody v Pahlavi
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 22, 2024
    ...2017 BCSC 273 at para. 18. Such orders are discretionary and made pursuant to the court's inherent jurisdiction: Gichuru v. Purewal, 2018 BCSC 2288 at para. 53 Orders for security for costs are treated differently depending on whether they are being sought against a corporate or individual ......
3 cases
  • Gichuru v. Community Legal Assistance Society
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 15, 2021
    ...v. Purewal, 2018 BCCA 267 (plaintiff’s appeal from costs award by a chambers judge – heard June 20, 2018) 39. Gichuru v. Purewal, 2018 BCSC 2288 (defendant’s application for security for costs – heard November 30, 40. Gichuru v. Purewal, 2019 BCSC 484 (plaintiff’s petition for judicial ......
  • Scoretz v. Kensam Enterprises Inc.
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 17, 2021
    ...v. General Motors LLC, 2018 BCSC 1886 at paras. 22-24; Meade v. Armstrong (City), 2011 BCCA 63 at para. 12; Gichuru v. Purewal, 2018 BCSC 2288 at paras. 17-24, 55; Ocean Pastures Corporation v. Old Masset Economic Development Corporation, 2016 BCCA 12 at paras. 20-21. [73] The defendants ag......
  • Masjoody v Pahlavi
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 22, 2024
    ...2017 BCSC 273 at para. 18. Such orders are discretionary and made pursuant to the court's inherent jurisdiction: Gichuru v. Purewal, 2018 BCSC 2288 at para. 53 Orders for security for costs are treated differently depending on whether they are being sought against a corporate or individual ......