Giesbrecht v. Prpick
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Judge | Hawkes |
| Citation | 2024 ABCA 187 |
| Docket Number | 2401-0042AC |
| Date | 03 June 2024 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 practice notes
-
Cabin Ridge Project Limited v. Alberta
...Google Inc v Equustek Solutions Inc, 2017 SCC 34 at para 25; Piikani Nation v McMullen, 2020 ABCA 183 at para 15; Giesbrecht v Prpick, 2024 ABCA 187 at para [13] Because the application relates to an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court, the serious question assessment is no......
-
Lavoie v. Lukiw
...may still be granted where the evidence establishes exceptional circumstances even when the test has not been met: Giesbrecht v Prpick, 2024 ABCA 187, para [14] Whether there is a serious question to be determined on appeal is a low threshold: RJR-MacDonald, 337. It is met where an appeal i......
-
Barrette v. Wevers
...Ms. Prpick as an SRL in Debut Developments Incorporated v the Town of Redcliff, 2022 ABKB 809 at paras 4-24 & Giesbrecht v Prpick, 2024 ABCA 187 at paras 6-8. As shown by the number of reported decisions both in this Court and the Court of Appeal, Ms. Prpick is an experienced SRL on b......
-
Dow Chemical Canada ULC v. NOVA Chemicals Corporation
...to liquidate assets to pay, can also be compensated with money and will not necessarily constitute irreparable harm: Giesbrecht v Prpick, 2024 ABCA 187 at para 21 [Prpick]. [11] Other sequelae may contribute to a finding of irreparable harm. Examples may include interference with a going co......
Get Started for Free
5 cases
-
Cabin Ridge Project Limited v. Alberta
...Google Inc v Equustek Solutions Inc, 2017 SCC 34 at para 25; Piikani Nation v McMullen, 2020 ABCA 183 at para 15; Giesbrecht v Prpick, 2024 ABCA 187 at para [13] Because the application relates to an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court, the serious question assessment is no......
-
Lavoie v. Lukiw
...may still be granted where the evidence establishes exceptional circumstances even when the test has not been met: Giesbrecht v Prpick, 2024 ABCA 187, para [14] Whether there is a serious question to be determined on appeal is a low threshold: RJR-MacDonald, 337. It is met where an appeal i......
-
Dow Chemical Canada ULC v. NOVA Chemicals Corporation
...to liquidate assets to pay, can also be compensated with money and will not necessarily constitute irreparable harm: Giesbrecht v Prpick, 2024 ABCA 187 at para 21 [Prpick]. [11] Other sequelae may contribute to a finding of irreparable harm. Examples may include interference with a going co......
-
Barrette v. Wevers
...Ms. Prpick as an SRL in Debut Developments Incorporated v the Town of Redcliff, 2022 ABKB 809 at paras 4-24 & Giesbrecht v Prpick, 2024 ABCA 187 at paras 6-8. As shown by the number of reported decisions both in this Court and the Court of Appeal, Ms. Prpick is an experienced SRL on b......
Get Started for Free
