Giesbrecht v. Prpick
| Court | Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Judge | Devlin |
| Judgment Date | 26 January 2024 |
| Citation | 2024 ABKB 51 |
| Docket Number | 1608 00404 |
| Date | 26 January 2024 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
6 practice notes
-
Kostic v. Thom
...openness in litigation counterbalanced by security that what is required to be produced will be held confidential: Giesbrecht v Prpick, 2024 ABKB 51 at para 45, affirmed 2025 ABCA [18] As to the third potential restriction, see MBH at paras 83-85: [83] In most cases, the implied undertaking......
-
Giesbrecht v. Prpick
...written reasons holding that the applicant defamed the respondents and failed to make out a defence to defamation: Giesbrecht v Prpick, 2024 ABKB 51. He awarded each of the three respondents $40,000 in damages and permanently enjoined the applicant from continuing to spread allegations of c......
-
Giesbrecht v. Prpick
...Appeal from the Order by The Honourable Justice N.E. Devlin Dated the 26th day of January, 2024 Filed on the 9th day of February, 2024 (2024 ABKB 51, Docket: 1608 _______________________________________________________ Memorandum of Judgment _________________________________________________......
-
Debut Developments Incorporated v. Redcliff (Town)
...in a January 2015 letter (the “Defamation Action”). The reasons for decision in the Defamation Action are reported at Giesbrecht v Prpick, 2024 ABKB 51. Debut Developments Incorporated v the Town of Redcliff, 2022 ABKB 809 [Decision]. At the oral hearing before this Court, Danica Prpick, a ......
Get Started for Free
6 cases
-
Kostic v. Thom
...openness in litigation counterbalanced by security that what is required to be produced will be held confidential: Giesbrecht v Prpick, 2024 ABKB 51 at para 45, affirmed 2025 ABCA [18] As to the third potential restriction, see MBH at paras 83-85: [83] In most cases, the implied undertaking......
-
Giesbrecht v. Prpick
...written reasons holding that the applicant defamed the respondents and failed to make out a defence to defamation: Giesbrecht v Prpick, 2024 ABKB 51. He awarded each of the three respondents $40,000 in damages and permanently enjoined the applicant from continuing to spread allegations of c......
-
Giesbrecht v. Prpick
...Appeal from the Order by The Honourable Justice N.E. Devlin Dated the 26th day of January, 2024 Filed on the 9th day of February, 2024 (2024 ABKB 51, Docket: 1608 _______________________________________________________ Memorandum of Judgment _________________________________________________......
-
Debut Developments Incorporated v. Redcliff (Town)
...in a January 2015 letter (the “Defamation Action”). The reasons for decision in the Defamation Action are reported at Giesbrecht v Prpick, 2024 ABKB 51. Debut Developments Incorporated v the Town of Redcliff, 2022 ABKB 809 [Decision]. At the oral hearing before this Court, Danica Prpick, a ......
Get Started for Free
