Giles et al. v. Westminister Savings Credit, [2006] B.C.T.C. 141 (SC)
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Judge | Sigurdson, J. |
| Citation | [2006] B.C.T.C. 141 (SC),2006 BCSC 141 |
| Date | 27 January 2006 |
Giles v. Westminster Savings Credit, [2006] B.C.T.C. 141 (SC)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2006] B.C.T.C. TBEd. FE.030
Laurie Giles and others (plaintiffs) v. Westminster Savings Credit Union, Gary J. Thomas, Taylor Ventures Ltd., Ralph Dennis Taylor, Joanne Taylor, Floyd Taylor, Vince Taylor, Micheal G. Oliver, Raymond E. Drabik, Ewen C. Carruthers, and William R. Chalcraft, carring on business under the firm name and style of Oliver, Drabik, Carruthers & Chalcraft, a Partnership; Kenneth Rogers Appraisals Ltd. and Kenneth N. Rogers (defendants)
(S004562; 2006 BCSC 141)
Indexed As: Giles et al. v. Westminister Savings Credit Union et al.
British Columbia Supreme Court
Vancouver
Sigurdson, J.
January 27, 2006.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Equity - Topic 3606
Fiduciary or confidential relationships - General principles - What constitutes a fiduciary relationship - See paragraphs 272 to 294.
Equity - Topic 3652
Fiduciary or confidential relationships - Breach of fiduciary relationship - Liability of third parties or accessories (incl. doctrines of knowing receipt or assistance) - See paragraphs 317 to 546.
Equity - Topic 3713
Fiduciary or confidential relationships - Commercial relationships - Arm's length commercial transactions - See paragraphs 272 to 294.
Trusts - Topic 345
Creation of trust - Requirements of - Certainty of subject matter of trust - See paragraphs 171 to 257.
Trusts - Topic 354
Creation of trust - Intention - Certainty of intention - See paragraphs 171 to 257.
Trusts - Topic 358
Creation of trust - Intention - Trust v. contract - See paragraphs 171 to 257.
Trusts - Topic 371
Creation of trust - Purpose or object - General - See paragraphs 258 to 271.
Trusts - Topic 372
Creation of trust - Purpose or object - Certainty of objects - See paragraphs 171 to 257.
Trusts - Topic 375
Creation of trust - Purpose or object - "Quistclose" trust - See paragraphs 258 to 271.
Trusts - Topic 6153
The trustee - Breach of trust - Liability of stranger to trust (incl. accessory liability principle) - See paragraphs 317 to 546.
Counsel:
J. Laxton, Q.C., J. Shields and C. Weiler, for the plaintiffs;
J. Milton, D.A. Goult and R. Dalziel, for the defendant, Credit Union;
R. McGowan and L.J. O'Sullivan, for the defendant, Gary Thomas;
J. Webster, for the defendant lawyers.
This action was heard on November 17-19, 22-26, 29 and 30 and December 1-3 and 6-10, 2004 and March 21-24 and 29-31, April 7 and 8, 11-14 and 18 and 19, 2005, before Sigurdson, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on January 27, 2006.
Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Wilson et al. v. Switlo et al.
...J. of this Court discussed the admissibility of contextual evidence of this kind recently, in Giles v. Westminster Savings Credit Union , 2006 BCSC 141 at para. 136: The court must interpret and consider die formation of a contract on its factual matrix. In Chilly on Contracts, 29th ed. (Lo......
-
Fission Uranium Corp. et al. v. Dahrouge et al.
...Enterprises Ltd. v. Walji , 2004 BCSC 741 at paras. 199-200, aff'd 2006 BCCA 448; Giles v. New Westminster Savings Credit Union , 2006 BCSC 141 at paras. 466-68, 491, aff'd 2007 BCCA 411. Liability for knowing receipt does not require fraudulent conduct on the part of the fiduciary and does......
-
Larochelle v. Soucie Estate
...may inform (reflect back on) the matter of certainty of intention”: Angus at para. 95 and Giles v. Westminster Savings Credit Union, 2006 BCSC 141 at para. 240 (aff’d 2007 BCCA 411). In other words, because the certainties are reflexive, a lack of certainty as to subject matter can reinforc......
-
Giles et al. v. Westminster Savings Credit Union et al.
...in nature. [16] For the reasons that follow, I would dismiss the appeal. II. FINDINGS OF FACT [17] The trial judge explained his reasons (2006 BCSC 141) for dismissing the action in considerable detail. The key findings of fact relating to the issues on appeal are as follows. a. Terms of th......
-
Wilson et al. v. Switlo et al.
...J. of this Court discussed the admissibility of contextual evidence of this kind recently, in Giles v. Westminster Savings Credit Union , 2006 BCSC 141 at para. 136: The court must interpret and consider die formation of a contract on its factual matrix. In Chilly on Contracts, 29th ed. (Lo......
-
Fission Uranium Corp. et al. v. Dahrouge et al.
...Enterprises Ltd. v. Walji , 2004 BCSC 741 at paras. 199-200, aff'd 2006 BCCA 448; Giles v. New Westminster Savings Credit Union , 2006 BCSC 141 at paras. 466-68, 491, aff'd 2007 BCCA 411. Liability for knowing receipt does not require fraudulent conduct on the part of the fiduciary and does......
-
Giles et al. v. Westminster Savings Credit Union et al.
...in nature. [16] For the reasons that follow, I would dismiss the appeal. II. FINDINGS OF FACT [17] The trial judge explained his reasons (2006 BCSC 141) for dismissing the action in considerable detail. The key findings of fact relating to the issues on appeal are as follows. a. Terms of th......
-
Larochelle v. Soucie Estate
...may inform (reflect back on) the matter of certainty of intention”: Angus at para. 95 and Giles v. Westminster Savings Credit Union, 2006 BCSC 141 at para. 240 (aff’d 2007 BCCA 411). In other words, because the certainties are reflexive, a lack of certainty as to subject matter can reinforc......