Gill v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1202
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Citation | 2018 FC 1202 |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Date | 29 November 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Agbhonkese v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...it cured the evidentiary omission(s) that impacted the refusal of the initial application (Gill v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1202 at paras 12-16). In my opinion, the new evidence submitted with the Applicant’s reconsideration request warranted the officer’s ......
-
A.B. v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...stage involves an actual reconsideration of the decision on its merits (Hussein at para 55; Gill v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1202 at para 12 [Gill]). [22] There is no general obligation on officers to reconsider their decisions; the onus is on the applicant to show that ......
-
Katumbus v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 428
...the exercise of the officer’s discretion to reopen a prior decision is warranted (Gill v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1202 at para 14). [20] There is little question that, as a second stage decision, the Reconsideration Decision is not reasonable. In fairness to the ......
4 cases
-
Agbhonkese v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...it cured the evidentiary omission(s) that impacted the refusal of the initial application (Gill v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1202 at paras 12-16). In my opinion, the new evidence submitted with the Applicant’s reconsideration request warranted the officer’s ......
-
Wophill v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1618
...permit residence application. This is the sort of conclusion that Justice Diner reached in Gill v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1202 [Gill] at paragraphs 15 to 17. In that case, the respondent argued that the officer stopped at the first step and refused to reconsider the re......
-
A.B. v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...stage involves an actual reconsideration of the decision on its merits (Hussein at para 55; Gill v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1202 at para 12 [Gill]). [22] There is no general obligation on officers to reconsider their decisions; the onus is on the applicant to show that ......
-
Katumbus v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 428
...the exercise of the officer’s discretion to reopen a prior decision is warranted (Gill v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1202 at para 14). [20] There is little question that, as a second stage decision, the Reconsideration Decision is not reasonable. In fairness to the ......