Gill v. The Queen, 2016 TCC 13
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW,SALE OF LAND,CONTRACTS |
| Citation | 2016 TCC 13 |
| Court | Tax Court (Canada) |
| Date | 15 January 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Sindhi v. The King, 2023 TCC 102
...Queen, 2018 TCC 258 , a decision of Justice Bocock; Fard v The Queen, 2022 TCC 42 , a decision of Deputy Judge Masse; Gill v The Queen, 2016 TCC 13, a decision of Justice Smith; Kniazev v The Queen, 2019 TCC 58 , a decision of Justice Smith; Margolin v The Queen, 2018 TCC 36 , a decisio......
-
Kniazev v. The Queen, 2019 TCC 58
...would be acquired for use as a “primary place of residence”. This issue was reviewed in some detail in the decision of Gill v. The Queen, 2016 TCC 13 (“Gill”). In that decision, I referred to the decision of Kandiah v. The Queen, 2014 TCC 276, where Justice C. Miller stated at paragraph 18 ......
-
Fard v. The Queen, 2022 TCC 42
...the first to occupy the property as a place of residence within the meaning of paragraph 254(2)(g) of the ETA. [34] In Gill v. The Queen, 2016 TCC 13, Justice Guy Smith, observed the following regarding the occupancy requirement of paragraph 254(2)(g): 29. In my view, the considerations ide......
3 cases
-
Sindhi v. The King, 2023 TCC 102
...Queen, 2018 TCC 258 , a decision of Justice Bocock; Fard v The Queen, 2022 TCC 42 , a decision of Deputy Judge Masse; Gill v The Queen, 2016 TCC 13, a decision of Justice Smith; Kniazev v The Queen, 2019 TCC 58 , a decision of Justice Smith; Margolin v The Queen, 2018 TCC 36 , a decisio......
-
Kniazev v. The Queen, 2019 TCC 58
...would be acquired for use as a “primary place of residence”. This issue was reviewed in some detail in the decision of Gill v. The Queen, 2016 TCC 13 (“Gill”). In that decision, I referred to the decision of Kandiah v. The Queen, 2014 TCC 276, where Justice C. Miller stated at paragraph 18 ......
-
Fard v. The Queen, 2022 TCC 42
...the first to occupy the property as a place of residence within the meaning of paragraph 254(2)(g) of the ETA. [34] In Gill v. The Queen, 2016 TCC 13, Justice Guy Smith, observed the following regarding the occupancy requirement of paragraph 254(2)(g): 29. In my view, the considerations ide......