Giustini v Workman, 2021 ABCA 65
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Myra Bielby,The Honourable Madam Justice Jolaine Antonio,The Honourable Mr. Justice Kevin Feehan |
| Docket Number | 1901-0267-AC |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Date | 18 February 2021 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Woodbridge Homes Inc. v Palmer,
...Similarly, for a negligent misrepresentation, the Plaintiff must prove: ( Queen v Cognos Inc, [1993] 1 SCR 87 at 110; Giustini v Workman, 2021 ABCA 65 at para 36). 1. There is a duty of care based on a special relationship between the Plaintiff and the Defendant; 2. The Defendant's rep......
-
Mewburn v Mowbrey Gil LLP,
...168872 Ontario Inc v Maple Leaf Foods Inc, 2020 SCC 35; · Giustini v Workman, 2021 ABCA 65; · Lavender v Miller Bernstein LLP, 2018 ONXCA · ......
-
JSG v Alberta (Director of Child, Youth and Family Enhancement),
...actions resulted in a loss: Bruno Appliance & Furniture, Inc v Hryniak, 2014 SCC 8, para 21, [2014] 1 SCR 126; Giustini v Workman, 2021 ABCA 65, para 34. [16] The chambers judge, relying upon Bruno; Giustini; and GMJ v SJS, 2015 BCSC 531, paras ......
-
Bang v. Kim,
...The need for a causal connection between the alleged illegality and the remedy sought was discussed in Giustini v. Workman, 2021 ABCA 65: [47] Dirom [v Perera, 2004 ABQB 657], paras 224-225, emphasizes the need for a causal link be......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
-
Mewburn v Mowbrey Gil LLP,
...168872 Ontario Inc v Maple Leaf Foods Inc, 2020 SCC 35; · Giustini v Workman, 2021 ABCA 65; · Lavender v Miller Bernstein LLP, 2018 ONXCA · ......
-
JSG v Alberta (Director of Child, Youth and Family Enhancement),
...actions resulted in a loss: Bruno Appliance & Furniture, Inc v Hryniak, 2014 SCC 8, para 21, [2014] 1 SCR 126; Giustini v Workman, 2021 ABCA 65, para 34. [16] The chambers judge, relying upon Bruno; Giustini; and GMJ v SJS, 2015 BCSC 531, paras ......
-
Bang v. Kim,
...The need for a causal connection between the alleged illegality and the remedy sought was discussed in Giustini v. Workman, 2021 ABCA 65: [47] Dirom [v Perera, 2004 ABQB 657], paras 224-225, emphasizes the need for a causal link be......
-
JSG v Alberta (Director of Child, Youth and Family Enhancement),
...in loss. [45] These elements of the tort of civil fraud were confirmed by the Alberta Court of Appeal in the case of Giustini v Workman, 2021 ABCA 65, at para [46] The court in GMJ applied these elements in its decision at paragraph 50, and found that the respondents had knowingly and inten......