Glick v. Cale
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Judge | Kiteley, J. |
| Citation | [2013] O.T.C. Uned. 893 (SC),[2013] O.T.C. Uned. 893,2013 ONSC 893 |
| Date | 07 February 2013 |
| Subject Matter | FAMILY LAW,COURTS,PRACTICE |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
37 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 4, 2022 ' April 8, 2022)
...v. Santos, 2017 ONSC 6725, Children's Aid Society of London and Middlesex v. B.(C.C.), 2007 CanLII 66699 (Ont. S.C.), Glick v. Cale, 2013 ONSC 893, A.A. v. D.S., 2022 ONSC 1389, Kramer v. Kramer (2003), 37 R.F.L. (5th) 381 (Ont. S.C.), Parniak v. Carter (2002), 30 R.F.L. (5th) 381 (Ont. C.J......
-
Remedies Available under Provincial and Territorial Legislation
...v Ursic , [2006] OJ No 2178 (CA); see also Baillie v Middleton , 2012 ONSC 3728 at paras 15–46, Pazaratz J; and compare Glick v Cale , 2013 ONSC 893 at paras 40–48, Kiteley J; and see LEG v AG , 2001 BCSC 649; Blais v Blais , 2008 BCSC 1785; Burke v Moore , ibid ; Russell v Russell , 2011 M......
-
Chapter 12: Remedies Available Under Provincial and Territorial Legislation
...Ursic v Ursic, [2006] OJ No 2178 (CA); see also Baillie v Middleton, 2012 ONSC 3728 at paras 15–46, Pazaratz J; and compare Glick v Cale, 2013 ONSC 893 at paras 40–48, Kiteley J; ACVP v AMP, 2022 ONCA 283; Byers v Byers, 2023 ONSC 297; and see LEG v AG, 2001 BCSC 649; Blais v Blais, 2008 BC......
-
Table of Cases
...ONSC 7202 44 Glaspy v Glaspy, 2011 NBCA 101 326 Glegg v Glass, 2020 ONCA 833 497 Glen v Glen, [1997] BCJ No 2806 (SC) 338 Glick v Cale, 2013 ONSC 893 574 Glowacki v Nesbeth, 2021 BCSC 535 663 GM v JG, 2023 NBKB 57 147 GM v JM, 2017 NWTSC 90 150 GMK v CLH, [2006] SJ No 399 589 GN v DN, 2009 ......
Get Started for Free
29 cases
-
Tsiriotakis v. Rizzo
...(2003), 37 R.F.L. (5th) 381, at paras. 36, 41. A “clinical issue” is not required before an assessment order is made: Glick v. Cale, 2013 ONSC 893, at paras. 40-46. The court also must consider whether the intrusive and time-consuming nature of an assessment would outweigh its benefits: Kra......
-
Bowers v. Snider
...ONCA 283 at para. 30. [13] Flood v. Flood, 2018 ONCJ 822, at para. 34. [14] Mantesso v. Mantesso (1991) 4 R.F.L. 128 (Gen.Div.). [15] 2013 ONSC 893, [2013] O.J. 573., at paras. 40 through 44. [16] Ibid., at para. 48. [17] Haggerty v. Haggerty 2007 ONCJ 279 [18] Glance v. Glance, 2000 Carswe......
-
Brown v. Kagan (Brown)
...he argues that it should be paid for by the mother. He also objects to the assessor proposed by the mother. [122] In Glick v. Cale, 2013 ONSC 893, at para. 48, Kiteley J. provided a non-exhaustive list of 15 criteria that may be considered in the determination of whether to order an assessm......
-
Clarke v Denyes
...the needs of the child. R.S.O. 1990, c. C.12, s. 30 (1); 2020, c. 25, Sched. 1, s. 8 (1). [49] In the often-cited case of Glick v Cale, 2013 ONSC 893 CanLII, at para. 48, the court cited the following factors relating to the family dynamic that the court can consider when determining whethe......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 4, 2022 ' April 8, 2022)
...v. Santos, 2017 ONSC 6725, Children's Aid Society of London and Middlesex v. B.(C.C.), 2007 CanLII 66699 (Ont. S.C.), Glick v. Cale, 2013 ONSC 893, A.A. v. D.S., 2022 ONSC 1389, Kramer v. Kramer (2003), 37 R.F.L. (5th) 381 (Ont. S.C.), Parniak v. Carter (2002), 30 R.F.L. (5th) 381 (Ont. C.J......
6 books & journal articles
-
Remedies Available under Provincial and Territorial Legislation
...v Ursic , [2006] OJ No 2178 (CA); see also Baillie v Middleton , 2012 ONSC 3728 at paras 15–46, Pazaratz J; and compare Glick v Cale , 2013 ONSC 893 at paras 40–48, Kiteley J; and see LEG v AG , 2001 BCSC 649; Blais v Blais , 2008 BCSC 1785; Burke v Moore , ibid ; Russell v Russell , 2011 M......
-
Chapter 12: Remedies Available Under Provincial and Territorial Legislation
...Ursic v Ursic, [2006] OJ No 2178 (CA); see also Baillie v Middleton, 2012 ONSC 3728 at paras 15–46, Pazaratz J; and compare Glick v Cale, 2013 ONSC 893 at paras 40–48, Kiteley J; ACVP v AMP, 2022 ONCA 283; Byers v Byers, 2023 ONSC 297; and see LEG v AG, 2001 BCSC 649; Blais v Blais, 2008 BC......
-
Table of Cases
...ONSC 7202 44 Glaspy v Glaspy, 2011 NBCA 101 326 Glegg v Glass, 2020 ONCA 833 497 Glen v Glen, [1997] BCJ No 2806 (SC) 338 Glick v Cale, 2013 ONSC 893 574 Glowacki v Nesbeth, 2021 BCSC 535 663 GM v JG, 2023 NBKB 57 147 GM v JM, 2017 NWTSC 90 150 GMK v CLH, [2006] SJ No 399 589 GN v DN, 2009 ......
-
Remedies Available under Provincial and Territorial Legislation
...v Ursic , [2006] OJ No 2178 (CA); see also Baillie v Middleton , 2012 ONSC 3728 at paras 15–46, Pazaratz J; and compare Glick v Cale , 2013 ONSC 893 at paras 40–48, Kiteley J; and see LEG v AG , 2001 BCSC 649; Blais v Blais , 2008 BCSC 1785; Kopp v Burke , 2014 MBQB 247; Moore v Moore , 201......
Get Started for Free