Good v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 1199
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2018 FC 1199 |
| Date | 28 November 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 practice notes
-
Whitford v. Red Pheasant First Nation, 2022 FC 436
...payments made during an election period. [22] I endorse what my colleague Justice McVeigh observed in Good v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 1199 [Good] which involved this same First Nation: [295] This leads me to make an unrequested observation that the Respondents have put themselves ......
-
McCallum v. Canoe Lake Cree First Nation, 2022 FC 969
...of proof for establishing that the requirements of s 31 have been met is the balance of probabilities (Good v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 1199 at para 49 [Good]; Papequash at para 33; McNabb at para 23; O’Soup at para 29, 92). [69] The Applicants allege contraventions of sections 9, ......
-
Johnstone v. Mistawasis Nêhiyawak First Nation, 2022 FC 492
...and irrelevant or inflammatory comments” should be given no weight in an application under section 30 of the FNEA (Good v Canada (AG), 2018 FC 1199 at paras 60, 63, 223, 226 [Good]). I will not give weight to any of the following portions of the affidavits contained in Ms. Johnstone’s Recor......
-
Flett v. Pine Creek First Nation, 2022 FC 805
...of proof for establishing that the requirements of s 31 have been met is the balance of probabilities (Good v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 1199 at para 49 [Good]; Papequash at para 33; McNabb at para 23; O’Soup at para 29, 92; Whitford at para 75). If an applicant leads sufficient evi......
Request a trial to view additional results
10 cases
-
Whitford v. Red Pheasant First Nation, 2022 FC 436
...payments made during an election period. [22] I endorse what my colleague Justice McVeigh observed in Good v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 1199 [Good] which involved this same First Nation: [295] This leads me to make an unrequested observation that the Respondents have put themselves ......
-
McCallum v. Canoe Lake Cree First Nation, 2022 FC 969
...of proof for establishing that the requirements of s 31 have been met is the balance of probabilities (Good v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 1199 at para 49 [Good]; Papequash at para 33; McNabb at para 23; O’Soup at para 29, 92). [69] The Applicants allege contraventions of sections 9, ......
-
Johnstone v. Mistawasis Nêhiyawak First Nation, 2022 FC 492
...and irrelevant or inflammatory comments” should be given no weight in an application under section 30 of the FNEA (Good v Canada (AG), 2018 FC 1199 at paras 60, 63, 223, 226 [Good]). I will not give weight to any of the following portions of the affidavits contained in Ms. Johnstone’s Recor......
-
Flett v. Pine Creek First Nation, 2022 FC 805
...of proof for establishing that the requirements of s 31 have been met is the balance of probabilities (Good v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 1199 at para 49 [Good]; Papequash at para 33; McNabb at para 23; O’Soup at para 29, 92; Whitford at para 75). If an applicant leads sufficient evi......
Request a trial to view additional results