Good v. Canada (Attorney General)
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2018 FC 1199 |
| Date | 28 November 2018 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
12 practice notes
-
Whitford v. Red Pheasant First Nation
...payments made during an election period. [22] I endorse what my colleague Justice McVeigh observed in Good v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 1199 [Good] which involved this same First Nation: [295] This leads me to make an unrequested observation that the Respondents have put themselves ......
-
Grégoire v. Comité d’appel Innu Takuaikan Uashat Mak Mani-Utenam
...election contestation within a First Nation, though under the First Nations Elections Act, SC 2014, c 5: Good v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 1199 at paras 57–68 [22] The respondent, who is the applicant on judicial review, is invoking an exception to the rule that only the record that......
-
McCallum v. Canoe Lake Cree First Nation
...of proof for establishing that the requirements of s 31 have been met is the balance of probabilities (Good v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 1199 at para 49 [Good]; Papequash at para 33; McNabb at para 23; O’Soup at para 29, 92). [69] The Applicants allege contraventions of sections 9, ......
-
Brass v. Key First Nation
...would have been different is not needed; d)the case law in the Federal Court (Papequash, paras 34 to 36; Good v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 1199, paras 54-55)and in the Court of Queen’s Bench for Saskatchewan (Cyr v McNab, 2016 SKQB 357; O’Soup, para 31) acknowledges that the languag......
Get Started for Free
12 cases
-
Whitford v. Red Pheasant First Nation
...payments made during an election period. [22] I endorse what my colleague Justice McVeigh observed in Good v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 1199 [Good] which involved this same First Nation: [295] This leads me to make an unrequested observation that the Respondents have put themselves ......
-
Grégoire v. Comité d’appel Innu Takuaikan Uashat Mak Mani-Utenam
...election contestation within a First Nation, though under the First Nations Elections Act, SC 2014, c 5: Good v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 1199 at paras 57–68 [22] The respondent, who is the applicant on judicial review, is invoking an exception to the rule that only the record that......
-
McCallum v. Canoe Lake Cree First Nation
...of proof for establishing that the requirements of s 31 have been met is the balance of probabilities (Good v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 1199 at para 49 [Good]; Papequash at para 33; McNabb at para 23; O’Soup at para 29, 92). [69] The Applicants allege contraventions of sections 9, ......
-
Brass v. Key First Nation
...would have been different is not needed; d)the case law in the Federal Court (Papequash, paras 34 to 36; Good v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 1199, paras 54-55)and in the Court of Queen’s Bench for Saskatchewan (Cyr v McNab, 2016 SKQB 357; O’Soup, para 31) acknowledges that the languag......
Get Started for Free
