Gosselin v. Québec (Attorney General), 2002 SCC 84

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeMcLachlin, Beverley; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; Iacobucci, Frank; Major, John C.; Bastarache, Michel; Binnie, William Ian Corneil; Arbour, Louise; LeBel, Louis
Citation2002 SCC 84,[2002] 4 SCR 429,JE 2003-126,[2002] ACS no 85,100 CRR (2d) 1,44 CHRR 363,119 ACWS (3d) 43,[2002] SCJ No 85 (QL),221 DLR (4th) 257,298 NR 1
Docket Number27418
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Date19 December 2002
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
275 practice notes
  • Wynberg et al. v. Ontario, (2006) 213 O.A.C. 48 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • July 7, 2006
    ...al. v. Ontario et al., [2000] 1 S.C.R. 950; 255 N.R. 1; 134 O.A.C. 201, refd to. [para. 25]. Gosselin v. Quebec (Procureur général), [2002] 4 S.C.R. 429; 298 N.R. 1; 2002 SCC 84, refd to. [para. Vriend et al. v. Alberta, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 493; 224 N.R. 1; 212 A.R. 237; 168 W.A.C. 237, refd to......
  • PHS Community Services Society et al. v. Canada (Attorney General), (2010) 281 B.C.A.C. 161 (CA)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • January 15, 2010
    ...2 S.C.R. 307; 260 N.R. 1; 141 B.C.A.C. 161; 231 W.A.C. 161; 2000 SCC 44, refd to. [para. 253]. Gosselin v. Québec (Procureur général), [2002] 4 S.C.R. 429; 298 N.R. 1; 2002 SCC 84, refd to. [para. R. v. Morgentaler, Smoling and Scott, [1988] 1 S.C.R. 30; 82 N.R. 1; 26 O.A.C. 1, refd to. [pa......
  • R. v. J.J., 2022 SCC 28
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • June 30, 2022
    ...Queen, [1985] 2 S.C.R. 350; Fleming v. Ontario, 2019 SCC 45, [2019] 3 S.C.R. 519; Gosselin v. Quebec (Attorney General), 2002 SCC 84, [2002] 4 S.C.R. 429; R. v. White, [1999] 2 S.C.R. 417; Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law v. Canada (Attorney General), 2004 SCC 4, [2004] 1......
  • Withler v. Canada (Attorney General), (2008) 263 B.C.A.C. 257 (CA)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • December 23, 2008
    ...Affairs) et al., [1999] 2 S.C.R. 203; 239 N.R. 1; 173 D.L.R.(4th) 1, refd to. [para. 61]. Gosselin v. Québec (Procureur général), [2002] 4 S.C.R. 429; 298 N.R. 1; 2002 SCC 84, refd to. [para. 61]. Granovsky v. Minister of Employment and Immigration, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 703; 253 N.R. 329; 2000 S......
  • Get Started for Free
176 cases
  • Wynberg et al. v. Ontario, (2006) 213 O.A.C. 48 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • July 7, 2006
    ...al. v. Ontario et al., [2000] 1 S.C.R. 950; 255 N.R. 1; 134 O.A.C. 201, refd to. [para. 25]. Gosselin v. Quebec (Procureur général), [2002] 4 S.C.R. 429; 298 N.R. 1; 2002 SCC 84, refd to. [para. Vriend et al. v. Alberta, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 493; 224 N.R. 1; 212 A.R. 237; 168 W.A.C. 237, refd to......
  • PHS Community Services Society et al. v. Canada (Attorney General), (2010) 281 B.C.A.C. 161 (CA)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • January 15, 2010
    ...2 S.C.R. 307; 260 N.R. 1; 141 B.C.A.C. 161; 231 W.A.C. 161; 2000 SCC 44, refd to. [para. 253]. Gosselin v. Québec (Procureur général), [2002] 4 S.C.R. 429; 298 N.R. 1; 2002 SCC 84, refd to. [para. R. v. Morgentaler, Smoling and Scott, [1988] 1 S.C.R. 30; 82 N.R. 1; 26 O.A.C. 1, refd to. [pa......
  • R. v. J.J., 2022 SCC 28
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • June 30, 2022
    ...Queen, [1985] 2 S.C.R. 350; Fleming v. Ontario, 2019 SCC 45, [2019] 3 S.C.R. 519; Gosselin v. Quebec (Attorney General), 2002 SCC 84, [2002] 4 S.C.R. 429; R. v. White, [1999] 2 S.C.R. 417; Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law v. Canada (Attorney General), 2004 SCC 4, [2004] 1......
  • Withler v. Canada (Attorney General), (2008) 263 B.C.A.C. 257 (CA)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • December 23, 2008
    ...Affairs) et al., [1999] 2 S.C.R. 203; 239 N.R. 1; 173 D.L.R.(4th) 1, refd to. [para. 61]. Gosselin v. Québec (Procureur général), [2002] 4 S.C.R. 429; 298 N.R. 1; 2002 SCC 84, refd to. [para. 61]. Granovsky v. Minister of Employment and Immigration, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 703; 253 N.R. 329; 2000 S......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
98 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Statutory Interpretation. Third Edition Preliminary Sections
    • June 23, 2016
    ...Canada v T Eaton Co, [1956] SCR 610, 4 DLR (2d) 1, 1956 CanLII 2…………….. .................237, 315 Gosselin v Quebec (Attorney General), [2002] 4 SCR 429, 221 DLR (4th) 257, 2002 SCC 84 ......................................................... 174, 176 Grand Trunk Railway Co of Canada v Hepw......
  • Measuring judicial activism on the Supreme Court of Canada: a comment on Newfoundland (Treasury Board) v. NAPE.
    • Canada
    • McGill Law Journal Vol. 48 No. 3, September 2003
    • September 1, 2003
    ...Charter, supra note 3, s. 7; B.C. Motor Vehicle, supra note 77. (88) B.C. Motor Vehicle, ibid. at 518; Gosselin v. Quebec (A.G.) (2002), 221 D.L.R. (4th) 257, 100 C.R.R. (2d) 1, 2002 SCC 84 at paras. 389-90, Arbour J., dissenting; New Brunswick (Minister of Health and Community Services) v.......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books National Security Law. Second Edition Accountability
    • August 5, 2021
    ...412 Gosselin v Quebec (Attorney General), [2002] 4 SCR 429, 221 DLR (4th) 257, 2002 SCC 84 .................................................................. 25 Gougeon v Gibson (1984), [1983] 2 FC 463, 10 CCC (3d) 492, [1984] FCJ No 13 (CA) .......................................................
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books International Human Rights Law Preliminary Sections
    • June 18, 2004
    ...[1997] 3 S.C.R. 844 ..........................247, 251, 262 Gosselin v. Quebec (Attorney General), [1999] R.J.Q. 1033 (C.A.), aff’d [2002] 4 S.C.R. 429, 2002 SCC 84 ..........80, 209, 210, 251, 305–7, 355 Guerin v. The Queen, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 335 ...................................................
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT