Gouverneur Inc. v. One Group LLC, 2015 FC 128
Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
Judge | Bédard, J. |
Subject Matter | ADMINISTRATIVE LAW,PRACTICE,CRIMINAL LAW |
Citation | 2015 FC 128 |
Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
Date | 03 February 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
Comité Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne v. Coors Brewing Company, 2024 FC 169
...its Mark, the Hearing Officer maintained the registration. [99] An appeal to this Court was allowed: Gouverneur Inc v The One Group LLC, 2015 FC 128. Although Madam Justice Bédard found that the Hearing Officer had erred in the statement of the test, the error “is not determinat......
-
Supershuttle International Inc. v. Fetherstonhaugh & Co., 2015 FC 1259
...56 of the Act, where no new evidence is filed, is reasonableness. I refer to the decisions in Gouverneur Inc. v. The One Group LLC , 2015 FC 128 at para 18; Ridout & Maybee LLP v. HJ Heinz Co. Australia Ltd. (2014), 454 F.T.R. 135 at paragraphs 27-28; and Alliance Laundry , supra at par......
-
Top Trademark Cases From The Canadian Courts In 2015
...was reasonable). Leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada was filed in December 2015. In Gouverneur Inc. v. The One Group LLC, 2015 FC 128, the registrant relied on "special circumstances" to defend against cancellation for non-use. The Federal Court confirmed that the Registrar must ......
-
Gouverneur Inc. v. One Group LLC, (2016) 483 N.R. 1 (FCA)
...that excused the non-use of the trademark (Trade-marks Act, s. 45). Gouverneur Inc. appealed. The Federal Court, in a decision cited as 2015 FC 128, allowed the appeal and ordered the Registrar to expunge the trademark. The One Group LLC The Federal Court of Appeal allowed the appeal. Given......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
-
Supershuttle International Inc. v. Fetherstonhaugh & Co., 2015 FC 1259
...56 of the Act, where no new evidence is filed, is reasonableness. I refer to the decisions in Gouverneur Inc. v. The One Group LLC , 2015 FC 128 at para 18; Ridout & Maybee LLP v. HJ Heinz Co. Australia Ltd. (2014), 454 F.T.R. 135 at paragraphs 27-28; and Alliance Laundry , supra at par......
-
Gouverneur Inc. v. One Group LLC, (2016) 483 N.R. 1 (FCA)
...that excused the non-use of the trademark (Trade-marks Act, s. 45). Gouverneur Inc. appealed. The Federal Court, in a decision cited as 2015 FC 128, allowed the appeal and ordered the Registrar to expunge the trademark. The One Group LLC The Federal Court of Appeal allowed the appeal. Given......
-
Hilton Worldwide Holding LLP v. Miller Thomson, 2018 FC 895
...point. It is consistent with the leading decisions on the justification for non-use: see, for example Gouverneur Inc v The One Group LLC, 2015 FC 128 at paras 37-39 (confirmed on this point, but overturned on other grounds: One Group LLC v Gouverneur Inc, 2016 FCA 109); Canada (Registrar of......
-
Live! Holdings, LLC v. Oyen Wiggs Green & Mutala LLP, 2019 FC 1042
...non-use (John Labatt Ltd v Cotton Club Bottling Co, [1976] FCJ No 11 (QL) at para 29, 25 CPR (2d) 115; Gouverneur Inc v The One Group LLC, 2015 FC 128 at para 38, 132 CPR (4th) 380, rev’d 2016 FCA 106, 265 ACWS (3d) 193 on other grounds; Harris Knitting, at 492). Live did not provide......
3 firm's commentaries
-
Top Trademark Cases From The Canadian Courts In 2015
...was reasonable). Leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada was filed in December 2015. In Gouverneur Inc. v. The One Group LLC, 2015 FC 128, the registrant relied on "special circumstances" to defend against cancellation for non-use. The Federal Court confirmed that the Registrar must ......
-
Cancellation Proceedings Against A Registered Canadian Trademark: When Can 'Special Circumstances' Justify Non-use?
...trademark from expungement. The recent decision of the Federal Court of Canada in Gouverneur Inc v The One Group LLC ("Gouverneur"), 2015 FC 128, examined in detail the "special circumstances" that may justify non-use of a trademark in the context of a section 45 proceeding. Gouverneur conc......
-
Formulation Patent Allegations Of Non-Infringement, Obviousness And Lack Of Utility Justified (Intellectual Property Weekly Abstracts Bulletin: Week Of March 2, 2015)
...delays in opening a Canadian establishment found not sufficient to support non-useof the markSTK Gouverneur Inc. v. The One Group LLC, 2015 FC 128 This is an appeal from a decision of the Registrar who refused to expunge the Respondent's mark pursuant to section 45 of the Trademarks Act. Th......