Grand Rapids v. Graham
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Judge | Major, Fish and Abella, JJ. |
| Citation | (2005), 338 N.R. 192 (Motion),250 DLR (4th) 193,2005 SCC 10,37 Admin LR (4th) 280,[2005] 1 SCR 143 |
| Date | 17 March 2005 |
| Subject Matter | COMPANY LAW,AGENCY,CONSTITUTIONAL LAW,REAL PROPERTY TAX,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
2 practice notes
-
Canada (Attorney General) v. Quadrini
...[para. 17]. Li (Y.) v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (2004), 327 N.R. 253; 2004 FCA 267, leave to appeal refused (2004), 338 N.R. 192 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada v. Canadian Telephone Employees Association et al., [199......
-
R. v. Hall (J.)
...was violated by the legislation being considered applied the test originally set out in Andrews v. Law Society of British Columbia (1989) 1 SCR 143, as restated in R. v. Kapp , 2008 2 SCR and Withler v. Canada (Attorney General) , [2011] 1 SCR 396 and applied in Nova Scotia (Attorney Genera......
2 cases
-
Canada (Attorney General) v. Quadrini
...[para. 17]. Li (Y.) v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (2004), 327 N.R. 253; 2004 FCA 267, leave to appeal refused (2004), 338 N.R. 192 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada v. Canadian Telephone Employees Association et al., [199......
-
R. v. Hall (J.)
...was violated by the legislation being considered applied the test originally set out in Andrews v. Law Society of British Columbia (1989) 1 SCR 143, as restated in R. v. Kapp , 2008 2 SCR and Withler v. Canada (Attorney General) , [2011] 1 SCR 396 and applied in Nova Scotia (Attorney Genera......