Granger v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Ontario, 2020 ONSC 4101
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Judge | Justice Glustein |
| Citation | 2020 ONSC 4101 |
| Date | 08 July 2020 |
| Docket Number | CV-18-00605134-00CP |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Gilani v. BMO Investments Inc.,
...of the “cause of action” conclusions reached by Belobaba J. in Stenzler; (ii) Applying the approach I followed in Granger v. Ontario, 2020 ONSC 4101, the end date of class membership is the date of the certification order, without prejudice to the definition being amended from time to time ......
-
Markowich v. Lundin Mining Corporation,
...161, at para. 51, leave to appeal refused, [2011] S.C.C.A. No. 441. [14] In Granger v. Ontario, 2020 ONSC 4101, the court adopted the above principles and added, at para. However, even with Ontario not filing a costs outline, a plaintiff does not ha......
-
Skands v Allergan Inc,
...Moreover, the situation at Bar is much different than that in Bruno. b. The reasoning in Granger v. Ontario, 2020 ONSC 4101, is not challenged in the context of the facts in that case, but it has few lessons, beyond the basic principles, for the case at Bar. The prin......
-
Asselstine v. Kia Canada Inc.,
...for fee approval, the court may consider that issue at that time: Granger v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Ontario, 2020 ONSC 4101, at paras. 16, 90, and 92. However, the defendants’ Fee Details are not relevant to the onus on Class Counsel to establish that the f......
4 cases
-
Gilani v. BMO Investments Inc.,
...of the “cause of action” conclusions reached by Belobaba J. in Stenzler; (ii) Applying the approach I followed in Granger v. Ontario, 2020 ONSC 4101, the end date of class membership is the date of the certification order, without prejudice to the definition being amended from time to time ......
-
Skands v Allergan Inc,
...Moreover, the situation at Bar is much different than that in Bruno. b. The reasoning in Granger v. Ontario, 2020 ONSC 4101, is not challenged in the context of the facts in that case, but it has few lessons, beyond the basic principles, for the case at Bar. The prin......
-
Asselstine v. Kia Canada Inc.,
...for fee approval, the court may consider that issue at that time: Granger v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Ontario, 2020 ONSC 4101, at paras. 16, 90, and 92. However, the defendants’ Fee Details are not relevant to the onus on Class Counsel to establish that the f......
-
Markowich v. Lundin Mining Corporation,
...161, at para. 51, leave to appeal refused, [2011] S.C.C.A. No. 441. [14] In Granger v. Ontario, 2020 ONSC 4101, the court adopted the above principles and added, at para. However, even with Ontario not filing a costs outline, a plaintiff does not ha......