Granger v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Ontario, 2020 ONSC 4101

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeJustice Glustein
Citation2020 ONSC 4101
Date08 July 2020
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Docket NumberCV-18-00605134-00CP
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Gilani v. BMO Investments Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • May 18, 2021
    ...of the “cause of action” conclusions reached by Belobaba J. in Stenzler; (ii) Applying the approach I followed in Granger v. Ontario, 2020 ONSC 4101, the end date of class membership is the date of the certification order, without prejudice to the definition being amended from time to time ......
  • Skands v Allergan Inc,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 2, 2021
    ...Moreover, the situation at Bar is much different than that in Bruno. b.     The reasoning in Granger v. Ontario, 2020 ONSC 4101, is not challenged in the context of the facts in that case, but it has few lessons, beyond the basic principles, for the case at Bar. The prin......
  • Asselstine v. Kia Canada Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • July 20, 2021
    ...for fee approval, the court may consider that issue at that time: Granger v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Ontario, 2020 ONSC 4101, at paras. 16, 90, and 92. However, the defendants’ Fee Details are not relevant to the onus on Class Counsel to establish that the f......
  • Markowich v. Lundin Mining Corporation,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • February 23, 2022
    ...161, at para. 51, leave to appeal refused, [2011] S.C.C.A. No. 441. [14]        In Granger v. Ontario, 2020 ONSC 4101, the court adopted the above principles and added, at para. However, even with Ontario not filing a costs outline, a plaintiff does not ha......
4 cases
  • Gilani v. BMO Investments Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • May 18, 2021
    ...of the “cause of action” conclusions reached by Belobaba J. in Stenzler; (ii) Applying the approach I followed in Granger v. Ontario, 2020 ONSC 4101, the end date of class membership is the date of the certification order, without prejudice to the definition being amended from time to time ......
  • Skands v Allergan Inc,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 2, 2021
    ...Moreover, the situation at Bar is much different than that in Bruno. b.     The reasoning in Granger v. Ontario, 2020 ONSC 4101, is not challenged in the context of the facts in that case, but it has few lessons, beyond the basic principles, for the case at Bar. The prin......
  • Asselstine v. Kia Canada Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • July 20, 2021
    ...for fee approval, the court may consider that issue at that time: Granger v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Ontario, 2020 ONSC 4101, at paras. 16, 90, and 92. However, the defendants’ Fee Details are not relevant to the onus on Class Counsel to establish that the f......
  • Markowich v. Lundin Mining Corporation,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • February 23, 2022
    ...161, at para. 51, leave to appeal refused, [2011] S.C.C.A. No. 441. [14]        In Granger v. Ontario, 2020 ONSC 4101, the court adopted the above principles and added, at para. However, even with Ontario not filing a costs outline, a plaintiff does not ha......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT