Guardian Insurance Co. of Canada v. 379227 Alberta Ltd. et al., (1999) 251 A.R. 334 (QB)
Judge | Romaine, J. |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
Case Date | August 16, 1999 |
Citations | (1999), 251 A.R. 334 (QB) |
Guardian Ins. Co. v. 379227 Alta. Ltd. (1999), 251 A.R. 334 (QB)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [1999] A.R. TBEd. SE.008
Guardian Insurance Company of Canada (plaintiff) v. 379227 Alberta Ltd., Dennis E. Dutchuk, Penelope E. Dutchuk and Campbell & Hillier Renovations Ltd. (defendants) and Stewart F. Gale and Stewart F. Gale & Associates Ltd.
(third parties)
(Action No. 9501-04624)
Indexed As: Guardian Insurance Co. of Canada v. 379227 Alberta Ltd. et al.
Alberta Court of Queen's Bench
Judicial District of Calgary
Romaine, J.
August 16, 1999.
Summary:
A contractor was unable to complete work under a contract and became liable under bonds of surety to pay its subtrades and suppliers and for completion of, and deficiencies in, the construction. The surety sued the contractor and individuals who had executed indemnity agreements, including Dutchuk, for monies paid out under the bond. Third party proceedings were commenced. Dutchuk applied for declarations that the solicitor for the surety and the solicitor for third parties were ineligible to continue to act for their respective clients. Dutchuk also sought a declaration that the defendants were entitled to call the surety's solicitor as a witness at the trial of the action.
The Alberta Court of Queen's Bench dismissed the application to declare the surety's and the third parties' solicitors ineligible to act. The court left the issue of whether the surety's solicitor might be compelled to testify at trial to the trial judge.
Barristers and Solicitors - Topic 808
Duty to court - Counsel as a witness - Order of disqualification - A surety sued Dutchuk under an indemnity agreement - Dutchuk asserted that the surety's solicitor had knowledge of an agreement between her and the surety's adjuster and sought a declaration that he should be disqualified and that she was entitled to call him as a witness - The solicitor denied knowledge - The Alberta Court of Queen's Bench left the decision of whether the solicitor could be called as a witness to the trial judge - The court noted that even if compelled to testify, the solicitor could continue to represent the surety if it did not put the court in an invidious position - Further, the Alberta Code of Professional Conduct prohibited a lawyer from acting in proceedings in which is was likely that the lawyer would give evidence that might be contested - If called, the solicitor's evidence might not be contested - See paragraphs 30 to 34.
Barristers and Solicitors - Topic 1504
Relationship with client - General - Solicitor-client relationship - What constitutes - Dutchuk became liable to a surety under an indemnity agreement - Dutchuk assisted the surety's adjuster in settling the claims and deficiencies and worked with the surety's solicitor in finalizing the settlement documents - Thereafter, the surety sued Dutchuk and others for deficiencies - After six years of litigation and just prior to trial, Dutchuk sought a declaration that the surety's solicitor should be disqualified because he had represented her during the settlements and she had disclosed confidential information to him - The Alberta Court of Queen's Bench held that there was no duty of confidentiality where no solicitor and client relationship existed - Further, no reasonable expectation of privacy arose out of a dual representation or retainer where special arrangements were not made - See paragraphs 19 to 29 -Alternatively, the court would have dismissed the application because of delay and the resulting harm to the surety - See paragraph 35.
Barristers and Solicitors - Topic 1648
Relationship with client - Confidential communications - Joint retainer by two or more parties - [See Barristers and Solicitors - Topic 1504 ].
Practice - Topic 3083
Application and motions - Applications - Delay - Effect of - [See Barristers and Solicitors - Topic 1504 ].
Cases Noticed:
MacDonald Estate v. Martin and Rossmere Holdings (1970) Ltd., [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1235; 121 N.R. 1; 70 Man.R.(2d) 241; [1991] 1 W.W.R. 705; 77 D.L.R.(4th) 249, refd to. [para. 19].
Gray, Administrator of MacDonald Estate - see MacDonald Estate v. Martin and Rossmere Holdings (1970) Ltd.
Martin v. Gray - see MacDonald Estate v. Martin and Rossmere Holdings (1970) Ltd.
Manville Canada Inc. v. Ladner Downs, [1992] 2 W.W.R. 323 (B.C.S.C.), refd to. [para. 22].
Gainers Inc. v. Pocklington (1995), 165 A.R. 274 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 24].
Wiskerke v. Rice, [1997] A.J. No. 968 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 29].
Essa (Township) v. Guergis; Membery v. Hill (1993), 15 O.R.(3d) 573 (Div. Ct.), refd to. [para. 30].
Webb v. Attewell et al. (1994), 50 B.C.A.C. 1; 82 W.A.C. 1 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 32].
Miller (J.T.) Construction Ltd. v. South Calgary Properties Ltd., [1995] 8 W.W.R. 146; 165 A.R. 361; 89 W.A.C. 361 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 35].
Authors and Works Noticed:
Law Society of Alberta, Code of Professional Conduct, generally [paras. 27, 33].
Counsel:
J.W. Rose, for the plaintiff;
David Wolfman, for the defendant;
David Laidlaw, for the third party.
This application was heard by Romaine, J., of the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench, Judicial District of Calgary, who delivered the following reasons for judgment on August 16, 1999.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Coe v. Sturgeon General Hospital District No. 100 et al., (2000) 274 A.R. 313 (QB)
...Bank of Commerce, [1987] 5 W.W.R. 252 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 20]. Guardian Insurance Co. of Canada v. 379227 Alberta Ltd. et al. (1999), 251 A.R. 334 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. Webb v. Attewell et al. (1994), 50 B.C.A.C. 1; 82 W.A.C. 1 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 33]. Authors and Works Notice......
-
Milverton Capital Corp. v. Thermo Tech Technologies Inc. et al., [2002] B.C.T.C. 773 (SC)
...Ltd. v. Lancaster Packing Inc. (1993), 51 C.P.R. (3d) 449 (Ont.Gen.Div), Guardian Insurance Co. of Canada v. 379227 Alberta Ltd. (1999), 251 A.R. 334 (Q.B.) and Filipovic v. Upshall (2000), 133 O.A.C. 151 (C.A.), do discuss certain indicia which may or may not determine that such a relation......
-
Jeffers v. Calico Compression Systems,
...Packing Inc. (1993), 51 C.P.R.(3d) 449 (Ont. Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 8]. Guardian Insurance Co. of Canada v. 379227 Alberta Ltd. (1999), 251 A.R. 334 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. Filipovic v. Upshall (2000), 133 O.A.C. 151 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 8]. McDonald Estate v. Martin and Rossmere Ho......
-
Willow v Bosecke, 2020 ABQB 208
...5588 (ON SC), 51 C.P.R. (3d) 449 (Ont.Gen.Div), Guardian Insurance Co. of Canada v. 379227 Alberta Ltd. (1999), 1999 ABQB 637 (CanLII), 251 A.R. 334 (Q.B.) and Filipovic v. Upshall (2000), 2000 CanLII 26971 (ON CA), 133 O.A.C. 151 (C.A.), do discuss certain indicia which may or may not dete......
-
Coe v. Sturgeon General Hospital District No. 100 et al., (2000) 274 A.R. 313 (QB)
...Bank of Commerce, [1987] 5 W.W.R. 252 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 20]. Guardian Insurance Co. of Canada v. 379227 Alberta Ltd. et al. (1999), 251 A.R. 334 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. Webb v. Attewell et al. (1994), 50 B.C.A.C. 1; 82 W.A.C. 1 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 33]. Authors and Works Notice......
-
Milverton Capital Corp. v. Thermo Tech Technologies Inc. et al., [2002] B.C.T.C. 773 (SC)
...Ltd. v. Lancaster Packing Inc. (1993), 51 C.P.R. (3d) 449 (Ont.Gen.Div), Guardian Insurance Co. of Canada v. 379227 Alberta Ltd. (1999), 251 A.R. 334 (Q.B.) and Filipovic v. Upshall (2000), 133 O.A.C. 151 (C.A.), do discuss certain indicia which may or may not determine that such a relation......
-
Jeffers v. Calico Compression Systems,
...Packing Inc. (1993), 51 C.P.R.(3d) 449 (Ont. Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 8]. Guardian Insurance Co. of Canada v. 379227 Alberta Ltd. (1999), 251 A.R. 334 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. Filipovic v. Upshall (2000), 133 O.A.C. 151 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 8]. McDonald Estate v. Martin and Rossmere Ho......
-
Willow v Bosecke, 2020 ABQB 208
...5588 (ON SC), 51 C.P.R. (3d) 449 (Ont.Gen.Div), Guardian Insurance Co. of Canada v. 379227 Alberta Ltd. (1999), 1999 ABQB 637 (CanLII), 251 A.R. 334 (Q.B.) and Filipovic v. Upshall (2000), 2000 CanLII 26971 (ON CA), 133 O.A.C. 151 (C.A.), do discuss certain indicia which may or may not dete......