Guest Editor’s Introduction: The Past, Present, and Future of Class Actions in Canada

• Author: Jasminka Kalajdzic
• Pages: 3-6

3

GUEST EDITOR’S INTRODUCTION:

THE PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE OF

CLASS ACTIONS IN CANADA

Jasminka Kalajdzic*

It was an honour to be invited to act as guest editor of the tenth-anniver-

sary is sue of the Canadian Class Action Review. The selection, review, and

editing of the papers i n this issue gave me a unique opportunity to engage

with lawyers and academics dedicated to the analysis and practice of

class action litigation. Their papers not only chronicle the important

developments of the past decade of class action jurisprudence but also

signal what may be coming in the years ahead.

We begin with Michael Molavi. In “Beyond the Courtroom: Access

to Justice, Privatization, and the Future of Class Action Research,” he

takes us th rough the f‌ive waves of access to justice discourse and sit uates

class actions within second-wave efforts to focus on the legal needs of

collective actors. Despite an emphas is on the economic rationale adopted

by courts in the early evolution of the device, recent literature and judi-

cial writ ing recognize that non-economic barr iers to justice must also be

overcome. In this way, class actions may serve a social mission as much

as a practical one.

The practical problem of f‌inancing class actions is at the forefront of

much access to justice literatu re, as Molavi conf‌irms. He argues th at exist-

ing institutional funding like the Class Proceedings Fund in Ontario is

not without its critics but that public funding is desirable when litiga-

tion engages public interests. He also discusses the political dimensions

of class actions, with a focus on the role of the “private attorney gen-

eral” — entrepreneurial class counsel who, for their own f‌inancial gain,

aggressively pursue defendants who violate regulatory laws. Although

the privatization of regulatory enforcement may enjoy wide provincial

support, Molavi questions the wisdom of permitting market forces to

determine social priorities and call s for better empirical research to sub-

stantiate claims that class actions enhance access to justice.

Several of the threads woven into Molavi’s essay are taken up by

* Associate P rofessor, University of Windsor, Faculty of L aw.

ccar 10.indb 31/19/2015 9:09:47 AM