Haikola v. The Personal Insurance Company, 2019 ONSC 5982
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | GLUSTEIN J. |
| Citation | 2019 ONSC 5982 |
| Date | 16 October 2019 |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Docket Number | CV-19-622974CP |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Fair Compensation or Unjustified Temptation to Compromise?: an Empirical Review of Requests for Honorarium Awards in Canadian Class Actions
...awards of $50,000 to both 77 See, for example, Miller v FSD Pharma Inc, 2021 ONSC 911 at para 17; Haikola v The Personal Insurance Co, 2019 ONSC 5982 at para 112 [Haikola]; Kaplan, above note 9 at paras 48 and 97–98; Toth, above note 53 at para 105. 78 McLean, above note 44 para 58. 79 Kapl......
-
Flesch v Apache Corporation,
...can be examined to determine if there is a “reasonable” claim to be advanced: Haikola v The Personal Insurance Company, 2019 ONSC 5982 at para. 48, 97 CCLI (5th) 73. The suggestion that the Management Development and Compensation Committee, which was an administrative instrume......
-
Setoguchi v Uber B.V.,
...in evidence can be considered in determining whether the pleading discloses a cause of action: Haikola v. The Personal Insurance Company, 2019 ONSC 5982 at para [64] As to the first alleged breach, Uber claims (TR21-20/35 – 26/24) that the contract provides for unrestricted types of storage......
-
Redublo v. CarePartners,
...as an appropriate cy-près recipient in other class proceedings: see, for example, Haikola v. The Personal Insurance Company, 2019 ONSC 5982; Speevak v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, 2010 ONSC 1128. [78] For these reasons, I conclude that ......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 cases
-
Flesch v Apache Corporation,
...can be examined to determine if there is a “reasonable” claim to be advanced: Haikola v The Personal Insurance Company, 2019 ONSC 5982 at para. 48, 97 CCLI (5th) 73. The suggestion that the Management Development and Compensation Committee, which was an administrative instrume......
-
Setoguchi v Uber B.V.,
...in evidence can be considered in determining whether the pleading discloses a cause of action: Haikola v. The Personal Insurance Company, 2019 ONSC 5982 at para [64] As to the first alleged breach, Uber claims (TR21-20/35 – 26/24) that the contract provides for unrestricted types of storage......
-
Redublo v. CarePartners,
...as an appropriate cy-près recipient in other class proceedings: see, for example, Haikola v. The Personal Insurance Company, 2019 ONSC 5982; Speevak v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, 2010 ONSC 1128. [78] For these reasons, I conclude that ......
2 firm's commentaries
-
Another Privacy Class Action Settlement
...time incurred of 1.16, which is quite a modest return, in the scope of class actions. See: Haikola v. The Personal Insurance Company, 2019 ONSC 5982 The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specif......
-
Privacy Commissioner Of Canada Argues For Rights-Based Privacy Laws In Annual Report
...constitutional privacy rights under section 8 of the Charter. PIPEDA, supra note 1, ss. 13-14. Haikola v. The Personal Insurance Company, 2019 ONSC 5982. Ibid at para Ibid at paras 56-58. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (April 27, 2016), Art. 45 "Transfers on the basis of an adequacy decision". To......
1 books & journal articles
-
Fair Compensation or Unjustified Temptation to Compromise?: an Empirical Review of Requests for Honorarium Awards in Canadian Class Actions
...awards of $50,000 to both 77 See, for example, Miller v FSD Pharma Inc, 2021 ONSC 911 at para 17; Haikola v The Personal Insurance Co, 2019 ONSC 5982 at para 112 [Haikola]; Kaplan, above note 9 at paras 48 and 97–98; Toth, above note 53 at para 105. 78 McLean, above note 44 para 58. 79 Kapl......