HAILINK DENT REMOVAL INC. v. KINDERSLEY MAINLINE MOTOR PRODUCTS LIMITED, 2018 SKQB 138

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeR.S. SMITH J.
Citation2018 SKQB 138
Date03 May 2018
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
Docket NumberQBG 1590 of 2016
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • Digest: Hailink Dent Removal Inc. v Kindersley Mainline Motor Products Ltd., 2018 SKQB 138
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • May 3, 2018
    ...as: 2018 SKQB 138 Docket Number: QB17526 , QBG 1590/16 JCS Court: Court of Queen's Bench Date: 2018-05-03 Judges: Smith Subjects: Contract Law � Breach of Contract � Nonpayment Civil Procedure � Queen�s Bench Rules, Rule 7-2 Digest: The plaintiff applied for summary judgment pursuant to Que......
  • Woodbridge Homes Inc v Andrews, 2019 ABQB 585
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • August 1, 2019
    ...made between parties. The absence of a written contract is not fatal: Hailink Dent Removal Inc v Kindersley Mainline Motor Products Ltd, 2018 SKQB 138 at para 23. Absent writing, contracts can also be oral or inferred from conduct, but it is an understatement to say that a written contract ......
  • Digest: Hailink Dent Removal Inc. v Kindersley Mainline Motor Products Ltd., 2018 SKQB 180
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • June 11, 2018
    ...there was an enforceable contract between the parties that the defendant had hired the plaintiff to repair hail-damaged vehicles (see: 2018 SKQB 138). The court left the question of how much the defendant owed the plaintiff to be settled by agreement between the parties but if they failed t......
  • HAILINK DENT REMOVAL INC. v. KINDERSLEY MAINLINE MOTOR PRODUCTS LIMITED, 2018 SKQB 180
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • June 11, 2018
    ...[DCC Hail], (a competitor of Hailink), to prepare estimates for vehicles damaged in the hailstorm. [4] In my judgment dated May 3, 2018 (2018 SKQB 138) [Original Judgment], I noted at para. [25] Mr. Tumblin [of Hailink] says that he and Mr. Douglas [officer and co-owner of Mainline] agreed,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 cases
  • Woodbridge Homes Inc v Andrews, 2019 ABQB 585
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • August 1, 2019
    ...made between parties. The absence of a written contract is not fatal: Hailink Dent Removal Inc v Kindersley Mainline Motor Products Ltd, 2018 SKQB 138 at para 23. Absent writing, contracts can also be oral or inferred from conduct, but it is an understatement to say that a written contract ......
  • HAILINK DENT REMOVAL INC. v. KINDERSLEY MAINLINE MOTOR PRODUCTS LIMITED, 2018 SKQB 180
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • June 11, 2018
    ...[DCC Hail], (a competitor of Hailink), to prepare estimates for vehicles damaged in the hailstorm. [4] In my judgment dated May 3, 2018 (2018 SKQB 138) [Original Judgment], I noted at para. [25] Mr. Tumblin [of Hailink] says that he and Mr. Douglas [officer and co-owner of Mainline] agreed,......
  • SUNRISE FOODS INTERNATIONAL INC. v. MGM SPECIALTY LIVESTOCK LTD., 2020 SKQB 312
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • November 30, 2020
    ...In Hailink Dent Removal Inc. v Kindersley Mainline Motor Products Ltd., 2018 SKQB 138 at paras 22-23, Justice Smith addressed what is required for the creation and enforcement of a contract: 22 Contracts, oral or written, are enforceable so long as the parties have an intention to contract,......
2 books & journal articles
  • Digest: Hailink Dent Removal Inc. v Kindersley Mainline Motor Products Ltd., 2018 SKQB 138
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • May 3, 2018
    ...as: 2018 SKQB 138 Docket Number: QB17526 , QBG 1590/16 JCS Court: Court of Queen's Bench Date: 2018-05-03 Judges: Smith Subjects: Contract Law � Breach of Contract � Nonpayment Civil Procedure � Queen�s Bench Rules, Rule 7-2 Digest: The plaintiff applied for summary judgment pursuant to Que......
  • Digest: Hailink Dent Removal Inc. v Kindersley Mainline Motor Products Ltd., 2018 SKQB 180
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • June 11, 2018
    ...there was an enforceable contract between the parties that the defendant had hired the plaintiff to repair hail-damaged vehicles (see: 2018 SKQB 138). The court left the question of how much the defendant owed the plaintiff to be settled by agreement between the parties but if they failed t......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT