Halliwell v. Halliwell

JurisdictionOntario
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
JudgeGillese, Pepall and Roberts JJ.A.
Citation2017 ONCA 349
Date02 May 2017
Docket NumberC61692

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
18 practice notes
  • COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (December 14 ' December 18, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • December 23, 2020
    ...Standard Of Review, Divorce Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. 3 (2 nd Supp.), s. 15.2, Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines, Halliwell v. Halliwell, 2017 ONCA 349, Ballanger v. Ballanger, 2020 ONCA 626 , Hickey. Hickey, [1999] 2 S.C.R. 518 , Miglin v. Miglin, 2003 SCC 24 7084421 Canada Ltd. v Vincze......
  • Matrimonial Property Rights
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • August 3, 2020
    ...MBCA 97. See Martin v Sansome, 2014 ONCA 14; Korman v Korman, 2015 ONCA 578; Fielding v Fielding, 2015 ONCA 901; Halliwell v Halliwell, 2017 ONCA 349. Compare Gionet v Pingue, 2018 ONCA Rawluk v Rawluk, [1990] 1 SCR 70; Parsalidis v Parsalidis, 2012 ONSC 2963. See Chalmers v Copfer (1978), ......
  • Spousal Support on or After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...NBCA 20 ; Robaczewski v Larson, 2019 NSSC 78 ; see also Mason v Mason, 2016 ONCA 725 at para 52, Simmons JA; Halliwell v Halliwell, 2017 ONCA 349; Droit de la famille — 152477, 2015 QCCA 1618 . As to the impact of property division on the range of spousal support under the Spousal Suppo......
  • Matrimonial Property Rights
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...MBCA 97. See Martin v Sansome, 2014 ONCA 14; Korman v Korman, 2015 ONCA 578; Fielding v Fielding, 2015 ONCA 901; Halliwell v Halliwell, 2017 ONCA 349; Elbahr v El Hadi, 2020 ONSC 5176. Compare Gionet v Pingue, 2018 ONCA Lesko v Lesko, 2021 ONCA 369 at para 27, Brown JA. Rawluk v Rawluk, [19......
  • Get Started for Free
11 cases
  • Carruthers v. Carruthers and Whiteshore Land & Cattle
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • January 9, 2019
    ...enrichment) where the legislation already provides an adequate remedy to redress unfair and unjust outcomes: Halliwell v Halliwell, 2017 ONCA 349, 90 RFL (7th) 253; Horch v Horch, 2017 MBCA 97, 1 RFL (8th) 1; Martin v Sansome, 2014 ONCA 14, 118 OR (3d) 522; Symmons v Symmons, 2012 ONCA 747,......
  • S.B. v T.B.
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • January 1, 2022
    ...the relative conditions, means and needs of one or both of the parties: Baryla v Baryla, 2019 BCCA 22 [Baryla]; Halliwell v Halliwell, 2017 ONCA 349, 90 RFL (7th) 253 [Halliwell]; Chutter v Chutter, 2008 BCCA 507 at paras 75-79, 301 DLR (4th) 297 [Chutter]; Leskun v Leskun, 2006 SCC 25 at p......
  • TYACKE v TYACKE
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • October 25, 2019
    ...the relative conditions, means and needs of one or both of the parties: Baryla v Baryla, 2019 BCCA 22 [Baryla]; Halliwell v Halliwell, 2017 ONCA 349, 90 RFL (7th) 253 [Halliwell]; Chutter v Chutter, 2008 BCCA 507 at paras 75‑79, 301 DLR (4th) 297 [Chutter]; Leskun v Leskun, 2006 SCC 25 at p......
  • Dunn v. Dunn
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • October 3, 2019
    ...virtually identical: see Mason v. Mason, 2016 ONCA 725, 132 O.R. (3d) 641 (Ont. C.A.), at para. 53,” quoted in Halliwell v. Halliwell, 2017 ONCA 349, 138 O.R. (3d) 671, 90 R.F.L. (7th) 253, at para. 90. [3] Divorce Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. 3 (2nd Supp.). [4] See Identification and Placement of ......
  • Get Started for Free
3 firm's commentaries
  • COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (December 14 ' December 18, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • December 23, 2020
    ...Standard Of Review, Divorce Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. 3 (2 nd Supp.), s. 15.2, Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines, Halliwell v. Halliwell, 2017 ONCA 349, Ballanger v. Ballanger, 2020 ONCA 626 , Hickey. Hickey, [1999] 2 S.C.R. 518 , Miglin v. Miglin, 2003 SCC 24 7084421 Canada Ltd. v Vincze......
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 18 – December 22, 2017)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 2, 2018
    ...in part. Reasons: The standard of review of spousal support decisions is deferential. As the court observed in Halliwell v. Halliwell, 2017 ONCA 349, at para. 88, "[a]ppellate courts should not interfere with support orders unless the reasons disclose an error in principle, a significant mi......
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 1-5, 2017)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 12, 2017
    ...Moreover, no declaration that the mortgage was unenforceable was sought by the appellant in its counterclaim. Halliwell v Halliwell, 2017 ONCA 349 [Gillese, Pepall and Roberts JJ.A.] Counsel: Amey, for the appellant Bickle, for the respondent Keywords: Family Law, Spousal Support, Spousal S......
4 books & journal articles
  • Matrimonial Property Rights
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • August 3, 2020
    ...MBCA 97. See Martin v Sansome, 2014 ONCA 14; Korman v Korman, 2015 ONCA 578; Fielding v Fielding, 2015 ONCA 901; Halliwell v Halliwell, 2017 ONCA 349. Compare Gionet v Pingue, 2018 ONCA Rawluk v Rawluk, [1990] 1 SCR 70; Parsalidis v Parsalidis, 2012 ONSC 2963. See Chalmers v Copfer (1978), ......
  • Spousal Support on or After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...NBCA 20 ; Robaczewski v Larson, 2019 NSSC 78 ; see also Mason v Mason, 2016 ONCA 725 at para 52, Simmons JA; Halliwell v Halliwell, 2017 ONCA 349; Droit de la famille — 152477, 2015 QCCA 1618 . As to the impact of property division on the range of spousal support under the Spousal Suppo......
  • Matrimonial Property Rights
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...MBCA 97. See Martin v Sansome, 2014 ONCA 14; Korman v Korman, 2015 ONCA 578; Fielding v Fielding, 2015 ONCA 901; Halliwell v Halliwell, 2017 ONCA 349; Elbahr v El Hadi, 2020 ONSC 5176. Compare Gionet v Pingue, 2018 ONCA Lesko v Lesko, 2021 ONCA 369 at para 27, Brown JA. Rawluk v Rawluk, [19......
  • Spousal Support on or after Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • August 3, 2020
    ...BCCA 97 ; Robaczewski v Larson, 2019 NSSC 78 ; see also Mason v Mason, 2016 ONCA 725 at para 52, Simmons JA; Halliwell v Halliwell, 2017 ONCA 349; Droit de la famille — 2015 QCCA 1618 . 177 Chutter v Chutter, 2008 BCCA 507 ; Hsieh v Lui, 2017 BCCA 51 at para 44; PKM v JDM, 2019 BCSC......