Ham v. Dhaliwal
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Judge | Marzari |
| Citation | 2022 BCSC 520 |
| Docket Number | M179157; M196920; M199145 |
| Date | 30 March 2022 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 practice notes
-
Russell v. Christopherson
...disorder, and persistent postural perceptual dizziness as a result of the accidents at issue in that case; and · Ham v. Dhaliwal, 2022 BCSC 520, where Justice Marzari awarded $95,000 in non-pecuniary damages to the plaintiff who suffered chronic low back pain and other non-permanent soft ti......
-
Morrell v. Lippucci
...are divisible. [150] The law concerning how the principle of divisibility applies was summarized by Justice Marzari in Ham v. Dhaliwal, 2022 BCSC 520: [99] The principle of divisibility applies most obviously to injuries to different parts of the body. Divisibility may also be possible wher......
-
Klimek v. Lockhart
...difficult to see how the worsening of a single injury could be divided up. [52] Nevertheless, as noted by Marzari J. in Ham v. Dhaliwal, 2022 BCSC 520, there have been cases, decided since Bradley, in which this court has indeed “divided up” the worsening of a single injury in precisely tha......
-
Zahedi v. Rotzetter
...caused or contributed to the plaintiff’s injuries on the available evidence, the injuries are divisible. [100] In Ham v. Dhaliwal, 2022 BCSC 520, this Court discussed the principles of divisibility and indivisibility: [99] The principle of divisibility applies most obviously to injuries to ......
Get Started for Free
5 cases
-
Russell v. Christopherson
...disorder, and persistent postural perceptual dizziness as a result of the accidents at issue in that case; and · Ham v. Dhaliwal, 2022 BCSC 520, where Justice Marzari awarded $95,000 in non-pecuniary damages to the plaintiff who suffered chronic low back pain and other non-permanent soft ti......
-
Morrell v. Lippucci
...are divisible. [150] The law concerning how the principle of divisibility applies was summarized by Justice Marzari in Ham v. Dhaliwal, 2022 BCSC 520: [99] The principle of divisibility applies most obviously to injuries to different parts of the body. Divisibility may also be possible wher......
-
Klimek v. Lockhart
...difficult to see how the worsening of a single injury could be divided up. [52] Nevertheless, as noted by Marzari J. in Ham v. Dhaliwal, 2022 BCSC 520, there have been cases, decided since Bradley, in which this court has indeed “divided up” the worsening of a single injury in precisely tha......
-
Zahedi v. Rotzetter
...caused or contributed to the plaintiff’s injuries on the available evidence, the injuries are divisible. [100] In Ham v. Dhaliwal, 2022 BCSC 520, this Court discussed the principles of divisibility and indivisibility: [99] The principle of divisibility applies most obviously to injuries to ......
Get Started for Free
