Hamman v. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, 2020 BCCA 170
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Groberman,The Honourable Mr. Justice Fitch,The Honourable Mr. Justice Grauer |
| Citation | 2020 BCCA 170 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Date | 16 June 2020 |
| Docket Number | CA45486 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
2024 BCSC 339,
...the events depicted in the Video. To that end, I note the following passages from Hamman v. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, 2020 BCCA 170: [76] The rule in Browne v. Dunn seeks to preserve trial fairness and fairness to witnesses. It generally requires that if counsel is going to......
-
Schooler v Holliday,
...the events depicted in the Video. To that end, I note the following passages from Hamman v. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, 2020 BCCA 170: [76] The rule in Browne v. Dunn seeks to preserve trial fairness and fairness to witnesses. It generally requires that if counsel is going to......
-
Law Society of British Columbia v. Harding,
...para. 317, leave to appeal to SCC refused, [2018] 1 S.C.R. vi. [99] For example, in Hamman v. ICBC, 2020 BCCA 170, the appellant argued that ICBC violated the rule by not putting to a witness in cross-examination evidence that contradicted the witness, bu......
-
Nagy v. BCAA Insurance Corporation, 2020 BCCA 270
...Browne v Dunn applies is a question of law, reviewable on a standard of correctness: Hamman v Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, 2020 BCCA 170 at para 77; R v Drydgen, 2013 BCCA 253 at para [24] For the reasons that follow, I conclude that the jud......
2 cases
-
Law Society of British Columbia v. Harding,
...para. 317, leave to appeal to SCC refused, [2018] 1 S.C.R. vi. [99] For example, in Hamman v. ICBC, 2020 BCCA 170, the appellant argued that ICBC violated the rule by not putting to a witness in cross-examination evidence that contradicted the witness, bu......
-
Nagy v. BCAA Insurance Corporation, 2020 BCCA 270
...Browne v Dunn applies is a question of law, reviewable on a standard of correctness: Hamman v Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, 2020 BCCA 170 at para 77; R v Drydgen, 2013 BCCA 253 at para [24] For the reasons that follow, I conclude that the jud......