Hare v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 763
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Date | 14 July 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 practice notes
-
Sundralingam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1768
...and Immigration), 2010 FC 1290 at paras 10-12. [11] As Justice Strickland noted in Hare v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 763 [Hare], “the jurisprudence may remain unsettled as to the question of whether granting an oral hearing is one of procedural fairness, requir......
-
Iwekaeze v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 814
...[IRPR]: Garces Canaga v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 749 at paras 20–23; Hare v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 763 at para 11. These provisions read as follows: Consideration of application Examen de la demande 113 Consideration of an application for protecti......
-
Onyekweli-Ugeh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...Huang v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 940, at paras 12–17; Hare v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 763, at paras 11–12. [18] The argument for reasonableness, as summarized in Kioko, at paras 17-19, is that the officer’s decision whether to h......
-
Jystina v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 912
...case law (see Garces Canga v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 749 at para 22; Hare v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 763 at para 11, on the one hand, and on the other, Allushi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 722 at para 17, and FGH v Canada (Citize......
Request a trial to view additional results
11 cases
-
Sundralingam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1768
...and Immigration), 2010 FC 1290 at paras 10-12. [11] As Justice Strickland noted in Hare v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 763 [Hare], “the jurisprudence may remain unsettled as to the question of whether granting an oral hearing is one of procedural fairness, requir......
-
Iwekaeze v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 814
...[IRPR]: Garces Canaga v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 749 at paras 20–23; Hare v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 763 at para 11. These provisions read as follows: Consideration of application Examen de la demande 113 Consideration of an application for protecti......
-
Jystina v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 912
...case law (see Garces Canga v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 749 at para 22; Hare v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 763 at para 11, on the one hand, and on the other, Allushi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 722 at para 17, and FGH v Canada (Citize......
-
Onyekweli-Ugeh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...Huang v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 940, at paras 12–17; Hare v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 763, at paras 11–12. [18] The argument for reasonableness, as summarized in Kioko, at paras 17-19, is that the officer’s decision whether to h......
Request a trial to view additional results