Harkat v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtCourt of Appeal (Canada)
Citation2021 FCA 85
Date27 April 2021

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 practice notes
  • Mahjoub v. The Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • February 15, 2022
    ...a serious question of general importance for the court’s determination: IRPA, s. 82.3.  As noted in Harkat v. Canada (MCI), 2021 FCA 85, at para 15, Parliament prohibited appeals where a question has not been certified.  Section 79 of the IRPA provides that there is no righ......
  • Harkat v. Canada (Attorney General)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • October 28, 2021
    ...be closed. This was because the Federal Court had not certified a question: Harkat v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FCA 85, 332 A.C.W.S. (3d) 273 [Harkat 2021]. [15] No preliminary objection was, however, raised by the Attorney General under Rule 74 with respect t......
2 cases
  • Mahjoub v. The Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • February 15, 2022
    ...a serious question of general importance for the court’s determination: IRPA, s. 82.3.  As noted in Harkat v. Canada (MCI), 2021 FCA 85, at para 15, Parliament prohibited appeals where a question has not been certified.  Section 79 of the IRPA provides that there is no righ......
  • Harkat v. Canada (Attorney General)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • October 28, 2021
    ...be closed. This was because the Federal Court had not certified a question: Harkat v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FCA 85, 332 A.C.W.S. (3d) 273 [Harkat 2021]. [15] No preliminary objection was, however, raised by the Attorney General under Rule 74 with respect t......