Herrnbock v Input Capital Corp., 2020 SKCA 120

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeJackson, Caldwell and Whitmore JJ.A.
Citation2020 SKCA 120
Docket NumberCACV3592
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
Date27 October 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • DOLTER v. INPUT CAPITAL CORPORATION,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 1 Enero 2022
    ...from seizure under the Act and they must do more than make mere assertions of reasonable necessity: Herrnbock v Input Capital Corp., 2020 SKCA 120 at para 19; Glute v Agricultural Credit Corp. of Saskatchewan (1994), 121 Sask R 110 (QL) (Sask QB) at paras [18]     &......
  • RICHARDSON PIONEER LIMITED v. GHERASIM,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 26 Mayo 2021
    ...construed and it is the farmer who bears the onus of proving a right to the exemption. See for example: Herrnbock v Input Capital Corp., 2020 SKCA 120; Con‑Agra Ltd. v Shivak, 2001 SKQB 35, 202 Sask R 164; and Glute v Agricultural Credit Corp. of Saskatchewan, [1994] 7 WWR 212 (......
  • MFI AG Services Ltd. v Kramer Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 28 Julio 2022
    ...of staggering the timing for return of the farm equipment, as ordered by the Court of Appeal in Herrnbock v Input Capital Corp., 2020 SKCA 120. Having regard to all of the circumstances, as reviewed above, I find that it is not just to delay return of the farm equipment to [45]  &......
  • MFI Ag Services Ltd. v Kramer Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 17 Enero 2023
    ...are restricted to questions of law only. Questions of law attract a standard of review of correctness (Herrnbock v Input Capital Corp., 2020 SKCA 120 at paras 6–7; Naber at para [22]           When the appellants’ arguments are......
4 cases
  • RICHARDSON PIONEER LIMITED v. GHERASIM,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 26 Mayo 2021
    ...construed and it is the farmer who bears the onus of proving a right to the exemption. See for example: Herrnbock v Input Capital Corp., 2020 SKCA 120; Con‑Agra Ltd. v Shivak, 2001 SKQB 35, 202 Sask R 164; and Glute v Agricultural Credit Corp. of Saskatchewan, [1994] 7 WWR 212 (......
  • DOLTER v. INPUT CAPITAL CORPORATION,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 1 Enero 2022
    ...from seizure under the Act and they must do more than make mere assertions of reasonable necessity: Herrnbock v Input Capital Corp., 2020 SKCA 120 at para 19; Glute v Agricultural Credit Corp. of Saskatchewan (1994), 121 Sask R 110 (QL) (Sask QB) at paras [18]     &......
  • MFI Ag Services Ltd. v Kramer Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 17 Enero 2023
    ...are restricted to questions of law only. Questions of law attract a standard of review of correctness (Herrnbock v Input Capital Corp., 2020 SKCA 120 at paras 6–7; Naber at para [22]           When the appellants’ arguments are......
  • MFI AG Services Ltd. v Kramer Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 28 Julio 2022
    ...of staggering the timing for return of the farm equipment, as ordered by the Court of Appeal in Herrnbock v Input Capital Corp., 2020 SKCA 120. Having regard to all of the circumstances, as reviewed above, I find that it is not just to delay return of the farm equipment to [45]  &......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT