Herrnbock v Input Capital Corp., 2020 SKCA 120
Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
Judge | Jackson, Caldwell and Whitmore JJ.A. |
Citation | 2020 SKCA 120 |
Docket Number | CACV3592 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
Date | 27 October 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
DOLTER v. INPUT CAPITAL CORPORATION,
...from seizure under the Act and they must do more than make mere assertions of reasonable necessity: Herrnbock v Input Capital Corp., 2020 SKCA 120 at para 19; Glute v Agricultural Credit Corp. of Saskatchewan (1994), 121 Sask R 110 (QL) (Sask QB) at paras [18] &......
-
RICHARDSON PIONEER LIMITED v. GHERASIM,
...construed and it is the farmer who bears the onus of proving a right to the exemption. See for example: Herrnbock v Input Capital Corp., 2020 SKCA 120; Con‑Agra Ltd. v Shivak, 2001 SKQB 35, 202 Sask R 164; and Glute v Agricultural Credit Corp. of Saskatchewan, [1994] 7 WWR 212 (......
-
MFI AG Services Ltd. v Kramer Ltd.,
...of staggering the timing for return of the farm equipment, as ordered by the Court of Appeal in Herrnbock v Input Capital Corp., 2020 SKCA 120. Having regard to all of the circumstances, as reviewed above, I find that it is not just to delay return of the farm equipment to [45] &......
-
MFI Ag Services Ltd. v Kramer Ltd.,
...are restricted to questions of law only. Questions of law attract a standard of review of correctness (Herrnbock v Input Capital Corp., 2020 SKCA 120 at paras 6–7; Naber at para [22] When the appellants’ arguments are......
4 cases
-
RICHARDSON PIONEER LIMITED v. GHERASIM,
...construed and it is the farmer who bears the onus of proving a right to the exemption. See for example: Herrnbock v Input Capital Corp., 2020 SKCA 120; Con‑Agra Ltd. v Shivak, 2001 SKQB 35, 202 Sask R 164; and Glute v Agricultural Credit Corp. of Saskatchewan, [1994] 7 WWR 212 (......
-
DOLTER v. INPUT CAPITAL CORPORATION,
...from seizure under the Act and they must do more than make mere assertions of reasonable necessity: Herrnbock v Input Capital Corp., 2020 SKCA 120 at para 19; Glute v Agricultural Credit Corp. of Saskatchewan (1994), 121 Sask R 110 (QL) (Sask QB) at paras [18] &......
-
MFI Ag Services Ltd. v Kramer Ltd.,
...are restricted to questions of law only. Questions of law attract a standard of review of correctness (Herrnbock v Input Capital Corp., 2020 SKCA 120 at paras 6–7; Naber at para [22] When the appellants’ arguments are......
-
MFI AG Services Ltd. v Kramer Ltd.,
...of staggering the timing for return of the farm equipment, as ordered by the Court of Appeal in Herrnbock v Input Capital Corp., 2020 SKCA 120. Having regard to all of the circumstances, as reviewed above, I find that it is not just to delay return of the farm equipment to [45] &......