Hicks v Gazley, 2020 ABQB 178
Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice M. J. Lema |
Citation | 2020 ABQB 178 |
Docket Number | 4803 185468 |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
Date | 10 March 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Hicks v Gazley,
...enforceability of the post-nuptial agreement on January 24, 2020. On March 10, 2020, Lema J issued a Judgment, cited as Hicks v Gazley, 2020 ABQB 178 [Hicks #1], concluding the post-nuptial agreement was enforceable. Ms. Gazley has appealed Hicks #1 and it will be considered by the Alberta ......
-
Hicks v Gazley, 2020 ABQB 525
...no children; · the outstanding corollary relief is family property and spousal support; · on the matrimonial-property front, I found (in 2020 ABQB 178) that a post-nuptial agreement between the parties was enforceable. (The wife had argued that the agreement was non-compliant with ss 37 and......
2 cases
-
Hicks v Gazley,
...enforceability of the post-nuptial agreement on January 24, 2020. On March 10, 2020, Lema J issued a Judgment, cited as Hicks v Gazley, 2020 ABQB 178 [Hicks #1], concluding the post-nuptial agreement was enforceable. Ms. Gazley has appealed Hicks #1 and it will be considered by the Alberta ......
-
Hicks v Gazley, 2020 ABQB 525
...no children; · the outstanding corollary relief is family property and spousal support; · on the matrimonial-property front, I found (in 2020 ABQB 178) that a post-nuptial agreement between the parties was enforceable. (The wife had argued that the agreement was non-compliant with ss 37 and......