Hicks v Gazley, 2020 ABQB 525

JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice M. J. Lema
Citation2020 ABQB 525
Docket Number4803 185468
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Date10 September 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Divorce: Jurisdiction; Judgments; Foreign Divorces; Grounds for Divorce; Bars
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • 25 Julio 2022
    ...v Arndt, 2018 MBQB 28; Zantingh v Zantingh, 2021 ONSC 2312, applying s 12(6) of the Ontario Family Law Rules. See also Hicks v Gazley, 2020 ABQB 525 at paras 8–9 listing cases for and against severance based on a fairness test. And see Burgsteden v Jewitt, 2020 SKQB 284 wherein Turcotte J i......
  • Hicks v Gazley,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 30 Noviembre 2020
    ...not be answered. Mr. Hicks failed to do either. [15] In lengthy Reasons for Judgment, dated September 10, 2020, cited as Hicks v Gazley, 2020 ABQB 525 [Hicks #2], Lema J applied the applicable test for severance set out by the Alberta Court of Appeal in Brousseau v Brousseau, 2017 ABCA 75 ......
  • Schmidt v Christie, 2021 ABQB 123
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 18 Febrero 2021
    ...and (d) [58] 2014 ONCJ 449 at paras 2-5, 21 and 43 [59] 2016 ABCA 100 at para 3 [60] 2020 QCCS 3748 at paras 9, 21, 22, 24, and 29 [61] 2020 ABQB 525 at paras 8 andp> [130]     In Hicks v Gazley[61], I reviewed various pro- and against-s...
  • Hicks v Gazley, 2020 ABQB 548
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 17 Septiembre 2020
    ...A. Introduction [1] A disappointed applicant for severance in a divorce context seeks a new severance hearing on an urgent basis. [2] In 2020 ABQB 525, I outlined my reasons for denying the applicant’s recent request for severance, emphasizing incomplete undertakings in the family [3] The a......
3 cases
  • Hicks v Gazley,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 30 Noviembre 2020
    ...not be answered. Mr. Hicks failed to do either. [15] In lengthy Reasons for Judgment, dated September 10, 2020, cited as Hicks v Gazley, 2020 ABQB 525 [Hicks #2], Lema J applied the applicable test for severance set out by the Alberta Court of Appeal in Brousseau v Brousseau, 2017 ABCA 75 ......
  • Schmidt v Christie, 2021 ABQB 123
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 18 Febrero 2021
    ...and (d) [58] 2014 ONCJ 449 at paras 2-5, 21 and 43 [59] 2016 ABCA 100 at para 3 [60] 2020 QCCS 3748 at paras 9, 21, 22, 24, and 29 [61] 2020 ABQB 525 at paras 8 andp> [130]     In Hicks v Gazley[61], I reviewed various pro- and against-s...
  • Hicks v Gazley, 2020 ABQB 548
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 17 Septiembre 2020
    ...A. Introduction [1] A disappointed applicant for severance in a divorce context seeks a new severance hearing on an urgent basis. [2] In 2020 ABQB 525, I outlined my reasons for denying the applicant’s recent request for severance, emphasizing incomplete undertakings in the family [3] The a......
1 books & journal articles
  • Divorce: Jurisdiction; Judgments; Foreign Divorces; Grounds for Divorce; Bars
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • 25 Julio 2022
    ...v Arndt, 2018 MBQB 28; Zantingh v Zantingh, 2021 ONSC 2312, applying s 12(6) of the Ontario Family Law Rules. See also Hicks v Gazley, 2020 ABQB 525 at paras 8–9 listing cases for and against severance based on a fairness test. And see Burgsteden v Jewitt, 2020 SKQB 284 wherein Turcotte J i......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT