Hollick v. Toronto (City),

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeMcLachlin, Beverley; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; Iacobucci, Frank; Major, John C.; Bastarache, Michel; Binnie, William Ian Corneil; Arbour, Louise
Citation2001 SCC 68,[2001] 3 SCR 158,42 CELR (2d) 26,[2001] CarswellOnt 3577,108 ACWS (3d) 774,[2001] SCJ No 67 (QL),277 NR 51,56 OR (3d) 214,13 CPC (5th) 1,JE 2001-1971,24 MPLR (3d) 9,205 DLR (4th) 19,153 OAC 279
Docket Number27699
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Date18 October 2001

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
951 practice notes
  • Hoy v. Expedia Group Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 28, 2022
    ...paras. 15 and 16; Western Canadian Shopping Centres Inc. v. Dutton, 2001 SCC 46 at paras. 26 to 29. [15] Hollick v. Toronto (City), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158 at para. 25; Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation, 2013 SCC 57 at paras. 99-105; Taub v. Manufacturers Life Insurance Co.,......
  • Gay v. Regional Health Authority 7 et al.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (New Brunswick)
    • February 27, 2014
    ...400 N.B.R.(2d) 111 ; 1038 A.P.R. 111 ; 2013 NBQB 72 , refd to. [para. 5]. Hollick v. Metropolitan Toronto (Municipality) et al., [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158; 277 N.R. 51 ; 153 O.A.C. 279 ; 2001 SCC 68 , consd. [para. Rumley et al. v. British Columbia, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 184 ; 275 N.R. 342 ; 15......
  • Pioneer Corp. v. Godfrey,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • September 20, 2019
    ...53 ; Alberta v. Elder Advocates of Alberta Society, 2011 SCC 24 , [2011] 2 S.C.R. 261 ; Hollick v. Toronto (City), 2001 SCC 68 , [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158; Central Trust Co. v. Rafuse, [1986] 2 S.C.R. 147 ; Peixeiro v. Haberman, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 549 ; Ermineskin Indian Band and Nation v. Cana......
  • Heller v. Uber Technologies Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • August 12, 2021
    ...paras. 15 and 16; Western Canadian Shopping Centres Inc. v. Dutton, 2001 SCC 46 at paras. 26 to 29. [42] Hollick v. Toronto (City), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158 at para. 25; Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation, 2013 SCC 57 at paras. 99-105; Taub v. Manufacturers Life Insurance Co.,......
  • Get Started for Free
707 cases
  • Hoy v. Expedia Group Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 28, 2022
    ...paras. 15 and 16; Western Canadian Shopping Centres Inc. v. Dutton, 2001 SCC 46 at paras. 26 to 29. [15] Hollick v. Toronto (City), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158 at para. 25; Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation, 2013 SCC 57 at paras. 99-105; Taub v. Manufacturers Life Insurance Co.,......
  • Gay v. Regional Health Authority 7 et al.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (New Brunswick)
    • February 27, 2014
    ...400 N.B.R.(2d) 111 ; 1038 A.P.R. 111 ; 2013 NBQB 72 , refd to. [para. 5]. Hollick v. Metropolitan Toronto (Municipality) et al., [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158; 277 N.R. 51 ; 153 O.A.C. 279 ; 2001 SCC 68 , consd. [para. Rumley et al. v. British Columbia, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 184 ; 275 N.R. 342 ; 15......
  • Pioneer Corp. v. Godfrey,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • September 20, 2019
    ...53 ; Alberta v. Elder Advocates of Alberta Society, 2011 SCC 24 , [2011] 2 S.C.R. 261 ; Hollick v. Toronto (City), 2001 SCC 68 , [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158; Central Trust Co. v. Rafuse, [1986] 2 S.C.R. 147 ; Peixeiro v. Haberman, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 549 ; Ermineskin Indian Band and Nation v. Cana......
  • Heller v. Uber Technologies Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • August 12, 2021
    ...paras. 15 and 16; Western Canadian Shopping Centres Inc. v. Dutton, 2001 SCC 46 at paras. 26 to 29. [42] Hollick v. Toronto (City), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158 at para. 25; Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation, 2013 SCC 57 at paras. 99-105; Taub v. Manufacturers Life Insurance Co.,......
  • Get Started for Free
13 firm's commentaries
  • Hail To The Chief: McLachlin C.J.C. Becomes Canada’s Longest-Serving Chief Justice
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • September 23, 2013
    ...than the seminal class actions trilogy of Western Canadian Shopping Centres Inc. v. Dutton, [2001] 2 SCR 534, Hollick v. Toronto (City), [2001] 3 SCR 158 and Rumley v. British Columbia, [2001] 3 SCR 184. These cases have come to define the test for certifying class actions in Canadian provi......
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 12 – 16, 2017)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 30, 2017
    ...judicial economy, behavior modification, and access to justice, citing AIC, at para. 22 and Hollick v. Toronto (City), 2001 SCC 68, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158, at para. 27, for this proposition. Finally, the Court stated that a certification judge's preferability analysis is entitled to considerab......
  • Top 5 Civil Appeals (July 2012)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 24, 2012
    ...basis in fact" for the existence of a common issue, the evidentiary threshold established in Hollick v. Toronto (City), 2001 SCC 68, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158. Fresco appealed to the Court of Appeal. Writing for the court, Winkler C.J.O. held that the motion judge and the majority of the Division......
  • Top 5 Civil Appeals From The Court Of Appeal (February 2012)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 1, 2012
    ...deference cannot shield errors in principle. Pursuant to the judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada in Hollick v. Toronto (City), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158, there are two core elements to the preferable procedure inquiry. The first element is whether the class action would be a fair, efficient a......
  • Get Started for Free
231 books & journal articles
  • Estimating Damages From Price-fixing
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 3-1, January 2006
    • January 1, 2006
    ...5, s. 1.1.  Gordon Kaiser, “The New Competition Law: Stage One” (1976) 1 Can. Bus. L.J. 147 at 192. 10 Hollick v. Toronto (City), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158 at 170 [Hollick]. 11 See Chadha, above note 2; Vitapharm Canada Ltd. v. F Hoffmann-La Roche . Ltd. (2000), 4 C.P (5th) 169 (Ont. S.C.J.); ......
  • La Dissuasion : 10 Ans de Jurisprudence Canadienn e en Matière D’autorisation D’exerc er un Recours Collect If
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 6-2, December 2010
    • December 1, 2010
    ...d’environnement de La Baie Inc. c. Société d’électrolyse & de chimie Alcan Ltée (1990), 29 Q.A.C. 251 at para. 46 (C.A.) [Alcan]. [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158 [Hollick]. 2010 ONSC 3790 [Inco]. Note that the original class representative during certification proceedings, Wilfred Pearson, was replaced......
  • Compensation for the Class: Ascertaining and Distributing Damages in a Competition Class Action
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 3-1, January 2006
    • January 1, 2006
    ...5, s. 1.1.  Gordon Kaiser, “The New Competition Law: Stage One” (1976) 1 Can. Bus. L.J. 147 at 192. 10 Hollick v. Toronto (City), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158 at 170 [Hollick]. 11 See Chadha, above note 2; Vitapharm Canada Ltd. v. F Hoffmann-La Roche . Ltd. (2000), 4 C.P (5th) 169 (Ont. S.C.J.); ......
  • Fee Agreements and Fee Appr Oval in Ontario Class Proceedings
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 6-2, December 2010
    • December 1, 2010
    ...d’environnement de La Baie Inc. c. Société d’électrolyse & de chimie Alcan Ltée (1990), 29 Q.A.C. 251 at para. 46 (C.A.) [Alcan]. [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158 [Hollick]. 2010 ONSC 3790 [Inco]. Note that the original class representative during certification proceedings, Wilfred Pearson, was replaced......
  • Get Started for Free