Hollick v. Toronto (City), 2001 SCC 68
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | McLachlin, Beverley; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; Iacobucci, Frank; Major, John C.; Bastarache, Michel; Binnie, William Ian Corneil; Arbour, Louise |
| Citation | 2001 SCC 68,[2001] 3 SCR 158,42 CELR (2d) 26,[2001] CarswellOnt 3577,108 ACWS (3d) 774,[2001] SCJ No 67 (QL),277 NR 51,56 OR (3d) 214,13 CPC (5th) 1,JE 2001-1971,24 MPLR (3d) 9,205 DLR (4th) 19,153 OAC 279 |
| Docket Number | 27699 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Date | 18 October 2001 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
900 practice notes
-
Endean v. British Columbia, 2016 SCC 42
...379; Western Canadian Shopping Centres Inc. v. Dutton, 2001 SCC 46, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 534; Hollick v. Toronto (City), 2001 SCC 68, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158; Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Society of Essex County v. Windsor (City), 2015 ONCA 572, 337 O.A.C. 315; Fantl v. Transamerica Life Canada, 20......
-
Heller v. Uber Technologies Inc., 2021 ONSC 5518
...paras. 15 and 16; Western Canadian Shopping Centres Inc. v. Dutton, 2001 SCC 46 at paras. 26 to 29. [42] Hollick v. Toronto (City), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158 at para. 25; Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation, 2013 SCC 57 at paras. 99-105; Taub v. Manufacturers Life Insurance Co.,......
-
Gay v. Regional Health Authority 7 et al., (2014) 421 N.B.R.(2d) 1 (CA)
...400 N.B.R.(2d) 111 ; 1038 A.P.R. 111 ; 2013 NBQB 72 , refd to. [para. 5]. Hollick v. Metropolitan Toronto (Municipality) et al., [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158; 277 N.R. 51 ; 153 O.A.C. 279 ; 2001 SCC 68 , consd. [para. Rumley et al. v. British Columbia, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 184 ; 275 N.R. 342 ; 15......
-
Pro‑Sys Consultants Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation, 2013 SCC 57
...remaining certification requirements is the standard articulated in this Court’s decision in Hollick v. Toronto (City), 2001 SCC 68, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158: the class representative must show some basis in fact for each of the certification requirements set out in the provincial class action l......
Request a trial to view additional results
655 cases
-
Endean v. British Columbia, 2016 SCC 42
...379; Western Canadian Shopping Centres Inc. v. Dutton, 2001 SCC 46, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 534; Hollick v. Toronto (City), 2001 SCC 68, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158; Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Society of Essex County v. Windsor (City), 2015 ONCA 572, 337 O.A.C. 315; Fantl v. Transamerica Life Canada, 20......
-
Heller v. Uber Technologies Inc., 2021 ONSC 5518
...paras. 15 and 16; Western Canadian Shopping Centres Inc. v. Dutton, 2001 SCC 46 at paras. 26 to 29. [42] Hollick v. Toronto (City), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158 at para. 25; Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation, 2013 SCC 57 at paras. 99-105; Taub v. Manufacturers Life Insurance Co.,......
-
Gay v. Regional Health Authority 7 et al., (2014) 421 N.B.R.(2d) 1 (CA)
...400 N.B.R.(2d) 111 ; 1038 A.P.R. 111 ; 2013 NBQB 72 , refd to. [para. 5]. Hollick v. Metropolitan Toronto (Municipality) et al., [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158; 277 N.R. 51 ; 153 O.A.C. 279 ; 2001 SCC 68 , consd. [para. Rumley et al. v. British Columbia, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 184 ; 275 N.R. 342 ; 15......
-
Pro‑Sys Consultants Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation, 2013 SCC 57
...remaining certification requirements is the standard articulated in this Court’s decision in Hollick v. Toronto (City), 2001 SCC 68, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158: the class representative must show some basis in fact for each of the certification requirements set out in the provincial class action l......
Request a trial to view additional results
14 firm's commentaries
-
Hail To The Chief: McLachlin C.J.C. Becomes Canadas Longest-Serving Chief Justice
...than the seminal class actions trilogy of Western Canadian Shopping Centres Inc. v. Dutton, [2001] 2 SCR 534, Hollick v. Toronto (City), [2001] 3 SCR 158 and Rumley v. British Columbia, [2001] 3 SCR 184. These cases have come to define the test for certifying class actions in Canadian provi......
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 12 16, 2017)
...judicial economy, behavior modification, and access to justice, citing AIC, at para. 22 and Hollick v. Toronto (City), 2001 SCC 68, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158, at para. 27, for this proposition. Finally, the Court stated that a certification judge's preferability analysis is entitled to considerab......
-
Top 5 Civil Appeals (July 2012)
...basis in fact" for the existence of a common issue, the evidentiary threshold established in Hollick v. Toronto (City), 2001 SCC 68, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158. Fresco appealed to the Court of Appeal. Writing for the court, Winkler C.J.O. held that the motion judge and the majority of the Division......
-
Top 5 Civil Appeals From The Court Of Appeal (February 2012)
...deference cannot shield errors in principle. Pursuant to the judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada in Hollick v. Toronto (City), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158, there are two core elements to the preferable procedure inquiry. The first element is whether the class action would be a fair, efficient a......
Request a trial to view additional results
231 books & journal articles
-
Antitrust Class Actions: Chaos in the Courts
...5, s. 1.1. Gordon Kaiser, “The New Competition Law: Stage One” (1976) 1 Can. Bus. L.J. 147 at 192. 10 Hollick v. Toronto (City), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158 at 170 [Hollick]. 11 See Chadha, above note 2; Vitapharm Canada Ltd. v. F Hoffmann-La Roche . Ltd. (2000), 4 C.P (5th) 169 (Ont. S.C.J.); ......
-
Summoning Leviathan: A Critical Analysis of Class Action Theory and the Ethics of Group Litigation
...Class Proceedings Act, above note 2, s. 5(2); Alberta Class Proceedings Act, above note 2, s. 6(2). Hollick v. Toronto (City), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158 [Hollick]. Ibid. at para. 16 [emphasis added]. The Supreme Court of Canada handed down three class action decisions in 2001, collectively ......
-
An Old Snail in a New Bottle? Waiver of Tort as An Independent Cause of Action
...the needs of vulnerable people whose social or psychological stigmatiza7 OLRC, above note 2 at 45–48. In Hollick v. Toronto (City), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158 at para. 27 [Hollick], the Supreme Court of Canada adopted the OLRC’s three justificatory rationales to decide whether a class proceeding w......
-
Catch and Release: Class Actions and Solvent Third Parties Under the Ccaa
...SCC 19 at paras 64–68. 16 Telephone interview of Gerry McNeilly by the author ( 21 January 2015 ). 17 2001 SCC 68 at paras 15 and 27, [2001] 3 SCR 158 [Hollick]. ccar 11-2.indb 206 3/8/ 2016 2:27 :21 PM Volume 11, N o 2, M arch 2016 207 and Western Canadian Shopping Centres Inc v Dutto......
Request a trial to view additional results