Hollick v. Toronto (City), 2001 SCC 68
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | McLachlin, Beverley; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; Iacobucci, Frank; Major, John C.; Bastarache, Michel; Binnie, William Ian Corneil; Arbour, Louise |
| Citation | 2001 SCC 68,[2001] 3 SCR 158,42 CELR (2d) 26,[2001] CarswellOnt 3577,108 ACWS (3d) 774,[2001] SCJ No 67 (QL),277 NR 51,56 OR (3d) 214,13 CPC (5th) 1,JE 2001-1971,24 MPLR (3d) 9,205 DLR (4th) 19,153 OAC 279 |
| Docket Number | 27699 |
| Subject Matter | PRACTICE |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Date | 18 October 2001 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
880 practice notes
-
Gay v. Regional Health Authority 7 et al., (2014) 421 N.B.R.(2d) 1 (CA)
...400 N.B.R.(2d) 111 ; 1038 A.P.R. 111 ; 2013 NBQB 72 , refd to. [para. 5]. Hollick v. Metropolitan Toronto (Municipality) et al., [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158; 277 N.R. 51 ; 153 O.A.C. 279 ; 2001 SCC 68 , consd. [para. Rumley et al. v. British Columbia, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 184 ; 275 N.R. 342 ; 15......
-
Elder Advocates of Alberta Society et al. v. Alberta et al., 2009 ABCA 403
...to raise duty of care - [See second Practice - Topic 209.3 ]. Cases Noticed: Hollick v. Metropolitan Toronto (Municipality) et al., [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158; 277 N.R. 51; 153 O.A.C. 279; 2001 SCC 68, refd to. [para. Hasket v. Equifax Canada Inc. - see Haskett v. Trans Union of Canada Inc. et al.......
-
Boal v. International Capital Management Inc., 2021 ONSC 651
...103. See also Batten v. Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd., 2017 ONSC 6098 at para. 19 (Div. Ct.). [11] Hollick v. Toronto (City), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158 at para. 25; Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation, 2013 SCC 57 at paras. 99-105; Taub v. Manufacturers Life Insurance Co., (199......
-
Atlantic Lottery Corp. Inc. v. Babstock, 2020 SCC 19
...2002 SCC 18 , [2002] 1 S.C.R. 595 ; Bhasin v. Hrynew, 2014 SCC 71 , [2014] 3 S.C.R. 494 ; Hollick v. Toronto (City), 2001 SCC 68 , [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158. By Karakatsanis J. (dissenting in part) R. v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd., 2011 SCC 42 , [2011] 3 S.C.R. 45 ; Hunt v. Carey Canada I......
Request a trial to view additional results
644 cases
-
Gay v. Regional Health Authority 7 et al., (2014) 421 N.B.R.(2d) 1 (CA)
...400 N.B.R.(2d) 111 ; 1038 A.P.R. 111 ; 2013 NBQB 72 , refd to. [para. 5]. Hollick v. Metropolitan Toronto (Municipality) et al., [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158; 277 N.R. 51 ; 153 O.A.C. 279 ; 2001 SCC 68 , consd. [para. Rumley et al. v. British Columbia, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 184 ; 275 N.R. 342 ; 15......
-
Elder Advocates of Alberta Society et al. v. Alberta et al., 2009 ABCA 403
...to raise duty of care - [See second Practice - Topic 209.3 ]. Cases Noticed: Hollick v. Metropolitan Toronto (Municipality) et al., [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158; 277 N.R. 51; 153 O.A.C. 279; 2001 SCC 68, refd to. [para. Hasket v. Equifax Canada Inc. - see Haskett v. Trans Union of Canada Inc. et al.......
-
Boal v. International Capital Management Inc., 2021 ONSC 651
...103. See also Batten v. Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd., 2017 ONSC 6098 at para. 19 (Div. Ct.). [11] Hollick v. Toronto (City), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158 at para. 25; Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation, 2013 SCC 57 at paras. 99-105; Taub v. Manufacturers Life Insurance Co., (199......
-
Atlantic Lottery Corp. Inc. v. Babstock, 2020 SCC 19
...2002 SCC 18 , [2002] 1 S.C.R. 595 ; Bhasin v. Hrynew, 2014 SCC 71 , [2014] 3 S.C.R. 494 ; Hollick v. Toronto (City), 2001 SCC 68 , [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158. By Karakatsanis J. (dissenting in part) R. v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd., 2011 SCC 42 , [2011] 3 S.C.R. 45 ; Hunt v. Carey Canada I......
Request a trial to view additional results
14 firm's commentaries
-
Hail To The Chief: McLachlin C.J.C. Becomes Canadas Longest-Serving Chief Justice
...than the seminal class actions trilogy of Western Canadian Shopping Centres Inc. v. Dutton, [2001] 2 SCR 534, Hollick v. Toronto (City), [2001] 3 SCR 158 and Rumley v. British Columbia, [2001] 3 SCR 184. These cases have come to define the test for certifying class actions in Canadian provi......
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 12 16, 2017)
...judicial economy, behavior modification, and access to justice, citing AIC, at para. 22 and Hollick v. Toronto (City), 2001 SCC 68, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158, at para. 27, for this proposition. Finally, the Court stated that a certification judge's preferability analysis is entitled to considerab......
-
Top 5 Civil Appeals (July 2012)
...basis in fact" for the existence of a common issue, the evidentiary threshold established in Hollick v. Toronto (City), 2001 SCC 68, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158. Fresco appealed to the Court of Appeal. Writing for the court, Winkler C.J.O. held that the motion judge and the majority of the Division......
-
Top 5 Civil Appeals From The Court Of Appeal (February 2012)
...deference cannot shield errors in principle. Pursuant to the judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada in Hollick v. Toronto (City), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158, there are two core elements to the preferable procedure inquiry. The first element is whether the class action would be a fair, efficient a......
Request a trial to view additional results
230 books & journal articles
-
An Old Snail in a New Bottle? Waiver of Tort as An Independent Cause of Action
...the needs of vulnerable people whose social or psychological stigmatiza7 OLRC, above note 2 at 45–48. In Hollick v. Toronto (City), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158 at para. 27 [Hollick], the Supreme Court of Canada adopted the OLRC’s three justificatory rationales to decide whether a class proceeding w......
-
Conspiracy Class Actions: Evidence on the Motion for Certification
...5, s. 1.1. Gordon Kaiser, “The New Competition Law: Stage One” (1976) 1 Can. Bus. L.J. 147 at 192. 10 Hollick v. Toronto (City), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158 at 170 [Hollick]. 11 See Chadha, above note 2; Vitapharm Canada Ltd. v. F Hoffmann-La Roche . Ltd. (2000), 4 C.P (5th) 169 (Ont. S.C.J.); ......
-
Foreword
...5, s. 1.1. Gordon Kaiser, “The New Competition Law: Stage One” (1976) 1 Can. Bus. L.J. 147 at 192. 10 Hollick v. Toronto (City), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158 at 170 [Hollick]. 11 See Chadha, above note 2; Vitapharm Canada Ltd. v. F Hoffmann-La Roche . Ltd. (2000), 4 C.P (5th) 169 (Ont. S.C.J.); ......
-
L’oratoire Saint-joseph Du Mont-royal v Jj and the Growing Complexity of Quebec’s Authorization Criteria
...In 2015, she received a Bachelor of Arts in anthropology from the University of British Columbia. Hollick v Toronto (City), 2001 SCC 68, [2001] 3 SCR 158 [Hollick]. Smith v Inco Ltd, 2011 ONCA 628, 107 OR (3d) 321 [Inco]. Windsor v Canadian Pacific Railway, 2007 ABCA 294, [2007] 12 WWR 5 [W......
Request a trial to view additional results