Hooge v. Gillwood Remanufacturing Inc., [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 11 (SC)

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeJoyce, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterEMPLOYMENT LAW
Citation[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 11 (SC),2014 BCSC 11,[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 11
Date07 January 2014
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
13 practice notes
  • Payne v. The Kimberley Academy Ltd., 2020 BCSC 506
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 2 April 2020
    ...the plaintiff could not prove damages resulting from the defendant's misrepresentation. [52] In Hooge v. Gillwood Remanufacturing Inc., 2014 BCSC 11, Justice Joyce set out the law on quantifying damages for loss of benefits beyond wages in the employment law 101 With respect to other fringe......
  • Wiltse v. Seastar Chemicals ULC, 2020 BCSC 658
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 29 April 2020
    ...allowed in part, 2013 BCCA 330 [Kerfoot]; McLeod v. Lifelabs BC LP, 2015 BCSC 1857 [McLeod]; and Hooge v. Gillwood Remanufacturing Inc., 2014 BCSC 11 [59] In Smith the parties agreed on a 19-month notice period; the plaintiff in that case was a 48-year-old professional engineer with more th......
  • Quesnelle v. Camus Hydronics Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 31 October 2022
    ...or in part, by accepting the offer if, objectively viewed, it is reasonable to do so”: Hooge v. Gillwood Remanufacturing Inc., 2014 BCSC 11, at para. [85]           The fact that Mr. Quesnelle had already commenced litigation when the......
  • Blomme v. Princeton Standard Pellet Corporation,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 24 April 2023
    ...to the date he was offered re-employment: para. 45. [105]    Similarly, in Hooge v. Gillwood Remanufacturing Inc., 2014 BCSC 11, the plaintiff had worked at a mill for 36 years when a new owner, Mr. Gill, advised him he was being laid off due to a shortage of work. The p......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
13 cases
  • Payne v. The Kimberley Academy Ltd., 2020 BCSC 506
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 2 April 2020
    ...the plaintiff could not prove damages resulting from the defendant's misrepresentation. [52] In Hooge v. Gillwood Remanufacturing Inc., 2014 BCSC 11, Justice Joyce set out the law on quantifying damages for loss of benefits beyond wages in the employment law 101 With respect to other fringe......
  • Wiltse v. Seastar Chemicals ULC, 2020 BCSC 658
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 29 April 2020
    ...allowed in part, 2013 BCCA 330 [Kerfoot]; McLeod v. Lifelabs BC LP, 2015 BCSC 1857 [McLeod]; and Hooge v. Gillwood Remanufacturing Inc., 2014 BCSC 11 [59] In Smith the parties agreed on a 19-month notice period; the plaintiff in that case was a 48-year-old professional engineer with more th......
  • Quesnelle v. Camus Hydronics Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 31 October 2022
    ...or in part, by accepting the offer if, objectively viewed, it is reasonable to do so”: Hooge v. Gillwood Remanufacturing Inc., 2014 BCSC 11, at para. [85]           The fact that Mr. Quesnelle had already commenced litigation when the......
  • Blomme v. Princeton Standard Pellet Corporation,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 24 April 2023
    ...to the date he was offered re-employment: para. 45. [105]    Similarly, in Hooge v. Gillwood Remanufacturing Inc., 2014 BCSC 11, the plaintiff had worked at a mill for 36 years when a new owner, Mr. Gill, advised him he was being laid off due to a shortage of work. The p......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT