Hopgood v. Hopgood (Estate), 2018 NSSC 100

JudgeHonourable Justice Glen G. McDougall
CourtSupreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
Case DateApril 26, 2018
JurisdictionNova Scotia
Citations2018 NSSC 100
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Klaptchuk v Johnson,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • February 22, 2023
    ...beneficiaries or creditors, as the case may be, to bear the loss which has occurred, rather than the trustee (Hopgood v Hopgood (Estate), 2018 NSSC 100 at para 64, 36 ETR (4th) 169). [58]           In our respectful view, the Chambers j......
  • Klaptchuk v Johnson,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • February 22, 2023
    ...or creditors, as the case may be, to bear the loss which has occurred, rather than the trustee ( Hopgood v Hopgood (Estate), 2018 NSSC 100 at para 64, 36 ETR (4th) 58 In our respectful view, the Chambers judge in this case fell into error because, once he found that Ms. Klaptchuk had breach......
  • Stevens Estate v Stevens and Stevens,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • January 12, 2021
    ...which “an ordinary prudent business person would have done in the circumstances”: Hopgood v. Hopgood (Estate), 2018 NSSC 100, paras 62 and [152]     The Applicant “ought fairly to be excused” if it will be “more equitable......
  • Zwicker v. Richardson (Estate), 2018 NSSC 327
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • December 20, 2018
    ...reasonableness is that which “an ordinary prudent business person would have done in the circumstances”: Hopgood v. Hopgood (Estate), 2018 NSSC 100, paras 62 and [152] The Applicant “ought fairly to be excused” if it will be “more equitable for the beneficiaries, rather than the [Applicants......
4 cases
  • Klaptchuk v Johnson,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • February 22, 2023
    ...beneficiaries or creditors, as the case may be, to bear the loss which has occurred, rather than the trustee (Hopgood v Hopgood (Estate), 2018 NSSC 100 at para 64, 36 ETR (4th) 169). [58]           In our respectful view, the Chambers j......
  • Klaptchuk v Johnson,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • February 22, 2023
    ...or creditors, as the case may be, to bear the loss which has occurred, rather than the trustee ( Hopgood v Hopgood (Estate), 2018 NSSC 100 at para 64, 36 ETR (4th) 58 In our respectful view, the Chambers judge in this case fell into error because, once he found that Ms. Klaptchuk had breach......
  • Stevens Estate v Stevens and Stevens,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • January 12, 2021
    ...which “an ordinary prudent business person would have done in the circumstances”: Hopgood v. Hopgood (Estate), 2018 NSSC 100, paras 62 and [152]     The Applicant “ought fairly to be excused” if it will be “more equitable......
  • Zwicker v. Richardson (Estate), 2018 NSSC 327
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • December 20, 2018
    ...reasonableness is that which “an ordinary prudent business person would have done in the circumstances”: Hopgood v. Hopgood (Estate), 2018 NSSC 100, paras 62 and [152] The Applicant “ought fairly to be excused” if it will be “more equitable for the beneficiaries, rather than the [Applicants......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT