Horfil Holding Corp. v. Queens Walk Inc.
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Judge | Nishikawa |
| Citation | 2019 ONSC 1381 |
| Docket Number | CV-17-585876 |
| Date | 27 February 2019 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
10 practice notes
-
Zanin v. Ooma Inc.
...when the amendments were made in the face of a motion to strike (Pass Herald at para 314, citing Horfil Holding Corp v Queens Walk Inc, 2019 ONSC 1381 at para 34). [516] In the present case, it is plain and obvious that Mr. Zanin has no tenable causes of action in light of the actual conten......
-
Pass Herald Ltd v. Google Llc
...is particularly so when the amendments have been made “in the face of … [a] motion to strike”: Horfil Holding Corp v Queens Walk Inc, 2019 ONSC 1381 at para [315] In the underlying action, Pass Herald alleges four distinct causes of action under section 36 of the Act, for breaches of sectio......
-
Kearns v Nickel
...27, South Holly Holdings Limited v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank, 2007 ONCA 456, at para. 6 and Horfil Holding Corp. v. Queens Walk Inc., 2019 ONSC 1381, 94 BLR (5th) 159, at paras. 137 Where there is nothing more the plaintiff can plead to support a cause of action, leave to amend should not ......
-
Doyle Salewski Inc. v. Scott et.al.
...[16] Livent, supra note 15 at paras. 31, 35. [17] Lysko v. Braley (2006), 79 OR (3d) 721 (C.A.), at para. 30; Horfil v. Queen’s Walk, 2019 ONSC 1381, 94 B.L.R. (5th) 159, at para. [18] Darmar Farms, supra note 15 at paras. 50-51 (citing Knight, supra note 3 at para. 21; George Weston, supra......
Get Started for Free
8 cases
-
Kearns v. Nickel
...27, South Holly Holdings Limited v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank, 2007 ONCA 456, at para. 6 and Horfil Holding Corp. v. Queens Walk Inc., 2019 ONSC 1381, 94 BLR (5th) 159, at paras. 33-34. [137] Where there is nothing more the plaintiff can plead to support a cause of a......
-
Doyle Salewski Inc. v. Scott et.al.
...[16] Livent, supra note 15 at paras. 31, 35. [17] Lysko v. Braley (2006), 79 OR (3d) 721 (C.A.), at para. 30; Horfil v. Queen’s Walk, 2019 ONSC 1381, 94 B.L.R. (5th) 159, at para. [18] Darmar Farms, supra note 15 at paras. 50-51 (citing Knight, supra note 3 at para. 21; George Weston, supra......
-
Filler Depot v. Copart Canada Inc.
...27, South Holly Holdings Limited v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank, 2007 ONCA 456 at para. 6 and Horfil Holding Corp. v. Queens Walk Inc., 2019 ONSC 1381 at paras. 33-34. D. EVIDENCE FILED BY THE PLAINTIFF [20] Most of the Defendant’s motion is based on Rule 21.01(1)(b), i.e., on the ground that......
-
Holland v. Toronto Police Services Board
...CanLII 46385 at para. 22, Tran v. University of Western Ontario, 2015 ONCA 295 at para. 27, and Horfil Holding Corp. v. Queens Walk Inc., 2019 ONSC 1381 at paras. 33-34.  [25]        I discuss below each of the causes of action pleaded by the Plaintif......
Get Started for Free
