Hornepayne First Nation et al. v. Medeiros et al., [2015] F.T.R. Uned. 175
| Judge | LeBlanc, J. |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Case Date | February 05, 2015 |
| Jurisdiction | Canada (Federal) |
| Citations | [2015] F.T.R. Uned. 175;[2015] F.T.R. Uned. 175 (FC);2015 FC 411 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Pharmascience Inc. v. Teva Canada, 2022 FCA 207
...fall squarely within other parts of Rule 400(3) should factor into a costs award: see, for example, Hornepayne First Nation v. Medeiros, 2015 FC 411; and Caruana v. Canada (Attorney General), 2006 FC 1355. [16] In making its award, the Federal Court did not expressly state it was relying on......
-
Cowessess First Nation No. 73 v. Pelletier, 2017 FC 859
...with in a judgment, the proper course is a motion to reconsider under Rule 397 (at para 9). Indeed, in Hornepayne First Nation v Medeiros, 2015 FC 411 [Hornepayne], Justice LeBlanc reconsidered and heard submissions on the issue of costs in a case where a motion had been granted without cos......
2 cases
-
Pharmascience Inc. v. Teva Canada, 2022 FCA 207
...fall squarely within other parts of Rule 400(3) should factor into a costs award: see, for example, Hornepayne First Nation v. Medeiros, 2015 FC 411; and Caruana v. Canada (Attorney General), 2006 FC 1355. [16] In making its award, the Federal Court did not expressly state it was relying on......
-
Cowessess First Nation No. 73 v. Pelletier, 2017 FC 859
...with in a judgment, the proper course is a motion to reconsider under Rule 397 (at para 9). Indeed, in Hornepayne First Nation v Medeiros, 2015 FC 411 [Hornepayne], Justice LeBlanc reconsidered and heard submissions on the issue of costs in a case where a motion had been granted without cos......