Hospira Healthcare Corporation v. Kennedy Trust for Rheumatology Research, 2020 FCA 177

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
Citation2020 FCA 177
CourtCourt of Appeal (Canada)
Date22 October 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Dixon v. TD Bank Group, 2021 FC 101
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 29, 2021
    ...enough to potentially change the result of the case:” see Hospira Healthcare Corporation v Kennedy Trust for Rheumatology Research, 2020 FCA 177 at para 7; see also Canada v South Yukon Forest Corporation, 2012 FCA 165 at para 46, quoted with approval in Benhaim v St‑Germain, ......
  • Sabok Sir v. Canada, 2021 FC 82
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 29, 2021
    ...enough to potentially change the result of the case:” see Hospira Healthcare Corporation v Kennedy Trust for Rheumatology Research, 2020 FCA 177 at para 7; see also Canada v South Yukon Forest Corporation, 2012 FCA 165 at para 46, quoted with approval in Benhaim v St‑Germain, ......
  • Dhillon v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 1167
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 18, 2020
    ...Corp v Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215 at 65-66; Hospira Healthcare Corporation v Kennedy Trust for Rheumatology Research, 2020 FCA 177 at para 6 [Hospira 2020]; Housen v Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33). Pure questions of law are reviewed on a correctness standard; however there ar......
  • Pharmascience Inc. v. Pfizer Canada ULC, 2020 FC 1175
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 21, 2020
    ...is relevant does not mean that it must be answered” (Hospira Healthcare Corporation v Kennedy Trust for Rheumatology Research, 2020 FCA 177 at para 8 [Hospira]). There is “a second hurdle” which is “proportionality.” Proportionality involves the degree of ......
4 cases
  • Dixon v. TD Bank Group, 2021 FC 101
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 29, 2021
    ...enough to potentially change the result of the case:” see Hospira Healthcare Corporation v Kennedy Trust for Rheumatology Research, 2020 FCA 177 at para 7; see also Canada v South Yukon Forest Corporation, 2012 FCA 165 at para 46, quoted with approval in Benhaim v St‑Germain, ......
  • Sabok Sir v. Canada, 2021 FC 82
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 29, 2021
    ...enough to potentially change the result of the case:” see Hospira Healthcare Corporation v Kennedy Trust for Rheumatology Research, 2020 FCA 177 at para 7; see also Canada v South Yukon Forest Corporation, 2012 FCA 165 at para 46, quoted with approval in Benhaim v St‑Germain, ......
  • Dhillon v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 1167
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 18, 2020
    ...Corp v Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215 at 65-66; Hospira Healthcare Corporation v Kennedy Trust for Rheumatology Research, 2020 FCA 177 at para 6 [Hospira 2020]; Housen v Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33). Pure questions of law are reviewed on a correctness standard; however there ar......
  • Pharmascience Inc. v. Pfizer Canada ULC, 2020 FC 1175
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 21, 2020
    ...is relevant does not mean that it must be answered” (Hospira Healthcare Corporation v Kennedy Trust for Rheumatology Research, 2020 FCA 177 at para 8 [Hospira]). There is “a second hurdle” which is “proportionality.” Proportionality involves the degree of ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT