Hungbeke v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 955
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2020 FC 955 |
| Date | 08 October 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Sedoh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...but did not. The respondent characterized Ezou as an outlier decision and relied on Hungbeke v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 955 (St-Louis J.). [33] The positions of the parties both raise concerns about line-drawing. The applicant’s position would draw a line around ......
-
Idu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...contrary (Nation-Eaton v Canada (Citizenship & Immigration), 2008 FC 294 at para 19; Hungbeke v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 955 at paras 39–41; Saifee at para 30). [33] This Court has also recognized that an officer is obliged to refer to the most up to date cou......
-
Ezou v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...Convention grounds, and instead presented vague and bald assertions of risk: Hungbeke v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 955 at para 41 [Hungbeke]. The applicants indicated a desire to come to Canada to be with Ms. Pyne’s family and for a better life, and the......
3 cases
-
Sedoh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...but did not. The respondent characterized Ezou as an outlier decision and relied on Hungbeke v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 955 (St-Louis J.). [33] The positions of the parties both raise concerns about line-drawing. The applicant’s position would draw a line around ......
-
Idu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...contrary (Nation-Eaton v Canada (Citizenship & Immigration), 2008 FC 294 at para 19; Hungbeke v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 955 at paras 39–41; Saifee at para 30). [33] This Court has also recognized that an officer is obliged to refer to the most up to date cou......
-
Ezou v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...Convention grounds, and instead presented vague and bald assertions of risk: Hungbeke v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 955 at para 41 [Hungbeke]. The applicants indicated a desire to come to Canada to be with Ms. Pyne’s family and for a better life, and the......