Hunt v. Canada

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtCourt of Appeal (Canada)
Citation2026 FCA 88
Date07 May 2026

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
14 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 29 – July 3, 2026)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 9, 2026
    ...Line Pilots Assn., [1993] 3 S.C.R. 724 , Piekut v. Canada (National Revenue), 2025 SCC 13 , R. v. Alex, 2017 SCC 37 , Hunt v. Canada, 2026 FCA 88, R. v. Rafilovich, 2019 SCC 51, R. v. Basque, 2023 SCC 18 , Bell ExpressVu Limited Partnership v. Rex, 2002 SCC 42 , R. v. McIntosh, [1995]......
  • Frontier Lithium Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • July 24, 2026
    ...et des droits de la jeunesse) v Directrice de la protection de la jeunesse du CISSS A, 2024 SCC 43 at para 24 [CISSS A]; Hunt v Canada, 2026 FCA 88 at paras 10-11, 13 [Hunt]). In relation to the “purpose” of the statute, the SCC held that legislative purpose alone cannot justify a departure......
  • Sierra Club Canada Foundation v. Canada (Environment and Climate Change)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • June 3, 2026
    ...language”: Placer Dome Canada Ltd. v. Ontario (Minister of Finance), 2006 SCC 20 , [2006] 1 S.C.R. 715 at para. 23; Hunt v. Canada, 2026 FCA 88 at para. 13; and see also M. Mancini, “The Purpose Error in the Modern Approach to Statutory Interpretation” (2022), 59 Alta. L. Rev. 919 a......
  • Trebell v. Canada Life Assurance Company
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • July 3, 2026
    ...text, so that “a meaning that is harmonious with the Act as a whole” may be discerned: Piekut, at paras. 43-44; see also Hunt v. Canada, 2026 FCA 88, at para. 13. That said, the text itself is the best indicator of legislative purpose, because it specifies “the means chosen by the legislatu......
  • Get Started for Free
13 cases
  • Frontier Lithium Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • July 24, 2026
    ...et des droits de la jeunesse) v Directrice de la protection de la jeunesse du CISSS A, 2024 SCC 43 at para 24 [CISSS A]; Hunt v Canada, 2026 FCA 88 at paras 10-11, 13 [Hunt]). In relation to the “purpose” of the statute, the SCC held that legislative purpose alone cannot justify a departure......
  • Sierra Club Canada Foundation v. Canada (Environment and Climate Change)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • June 3, 2026
    ...language”: Placer Dome Canada Ltd. v. Ontario (Minister of Finance), 2006 SCC 20 , [2006] 1 S.C.R. 715 at para. 23; Hunt v. Canada, 2026 FCA 88 at para. 13; and see also M. Mancini, “The Purpose Error in the Modern Approach to Statutory Interpretation” (2022), 59 Alta. L. Rev. 919 a......
  • Trebell v. Canada Life Assurance Company
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • July 3, 2026
    ...text, so that “a meaning that is harmonious with the Act as a whole” may be discerned: Piekut, at paras. 43-44; see also Hunt v. Canada, 2026 FCA 88, at para. 13. That said, the text itself is the best indicator of legislative purpose, because it specifies “the means chosen by the legislatu......
  • HRM v. Rank Incorporated
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • July 3, 2026
    ...chosen by Parliament to achieve its purposes and attain its goals” (R. v. Carignan, 2025 SCC 43 at para. 58).  In Hunt v. Canada, 2026 FCA 88 (“Hunt”), Stratas JA noted for the court that “the precise manner” in which the three elements of the Driedger approach “should be assessed and ......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 29 – July 3, 2026)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 9, 2026
    ...Line Pilots Assn., [1993] 3 S.C.R. 724 , Piekut v. Canada (National Revenue), 2025 SCC 13 , R. v. Alex, 2017 SCC 37 , Hunt v. Canada, 2026 FCA 88, R. v. Rafilovich, 2019 SCC 51, R. v. Basque, 2023 SCC 18 , Bell ExpressVu Limited Partnership v. Rex, 2002 SCC 42 , R. v. McIntosh, [1995]......