Index

• Pages: 451-472

451

Index

boriginal  egal ervices   

bsolute discharge –

ccelerated parole revie w  –

n 

ccounta bility prosecutors –

ctuarial testing 

extreme reliance on 

nuit oenders   n

subjective nature of –

dministr ation of justice oences 

n

dult orrectional er vices survey 

n

dult oenders

moral blameworth iness and CCC

– 

with youth record 

dult sentencing reg imes

collateral consequenc es  n

general deterrenceseparation object

ive s –

no statutory presumption aga inst

custodial sentence 

probation order variation 

nn  

purpose objectives a nd principles of

senten cing  – 

sanctions and –

vs youth sentencing  –

dvocacy anadia n model of 

dvocate See efence c ounsel

ggravatin g circumstances 

ggravatin g evidence  content as

 – 

ggravatin g factors – –

greed tatement of acts

conditions on release and  –

defence lawyers duty re –

use by prisoners eg security th reat

gro ups  –

llocution defence coun sel and 

n 

n cil lar y ha rm  –

ncillar y orders

counsel and –

types of –

452 |   

ppeals

admission of fresh ev idence 

appellate pathways –

by rown re sentence –

– 

procedura l framework for –

summary c onviction by rown 

trial judge deference to dec ision of

– 

ppellate c ourts

deference to sentencing judges See

eference to sentencing judge

tness of sentence –

Gladue decision and  –

interventionist approach  –

new sentencing hearing n

no role in  sentencing review 

n

po stse nten ce re port s   n

procedural fra mework for appeals to

 –

provincial review of judge s decisions

– 

review for sentence tness 

roles in sentencing –

scope of review of sentencing deci

sio ns  – 

sentencing range approach 

starting p oint approach –

n 

upreme ourt trilogy –

rchambault e port oyal ommis

sion eport  n 

ssisted suicide decriminalized –

ttendance order –

ttrition in crimin al process 

ail hearin gs legal aid and  n

ail under Youth Criminal Justice Act

– 

asford  on 

ill  Safe Streets and Communities

Act    

ill  

amendments re sentencing – 

n

ill  preceded –

conditi onal sentence s 

penal restra int and –

sentencing refor m – n

ill  – 

ill  –

ill  conditional sentences of

imprisonme nt  –

ill  proposed CCC ame ndments

re judiciary independence  –

lack defendants gu ilty plea and

 n

lack people overpredicted recidiv ism

rates 

lack women shackling  implications

of  n

lood testing requirement in probation

order – –

reakaway progra m 

rodeur eanaul –

urden of proof aggravating fac tors



yers atthew –

Canadian Charter of R ights and Freedoms

breaches s b rights sentencing

and  

disproport ionality mandatory m in

imum sentences 

oenders s  rights n

presentence caps s   decisions

 n

right to counsel s b n

anadian entencin g ommission

 – 

CCC revisions sentencing reforms

– 

denition of sentencing 

guideline sentences a nd 

proposals not adopted –