Injunctions to Protect Property
Author | Jeffrey Berryman |
Pages | 202-227 |
202
CHAPTER 8
INJUNCTIONS TO
PROTECT PROPERTY
A. INTRODUCTION
We saw in the previous chapter that the type of right infringed has
a bearing on remedial choice. During much of the period spanning
equity’s formative development, equity traditionally accorded realty a
reverence associated with the fact that it was the single most import ant
asset held by an individual, defining both social status and wealth.
Industrialization enhanced the value of land as a commodity upon
which to build much needed housing, to carry utility services without
impeding other use s of the land, to give support to adjoining structures,
and for the minerals that could be mined. Faced with a violation of
these property interests, the remedy in common law was deficient in
one important respect. Common law damages could only be assessed
for past wrongs, which left the property owner with the prospect of
facing endless future actions for compensation. Equity’s answer was
to grant a perpetual injunction prohibiting the trespass and restor-
ing any damage that had been incurred. Only after Lord Cairns’ Act
was passed in 1858,1 allowing damages in lieu of an injunction, could
compensation be given for prospective damages not reflected in the
diminution of the property’s market value. Against this state of affairs,
1An Act to amend the Cour se of Procedure in the High Court of Chancery, the Court
of Chancery in Ireland , and the Court of Chancery of the Cou nty Palatine of Lan-
ca ste r, 1858 (U.K.), 21 & 22 Vict., c. 27.
Injunctions to Prot ect Property203
courts developed a distinct preference for injunctive relief. The injunc-
tion became synonymous with the protection of property and reified
the notion that property could only be transferred through voluntary
consensual exchange. However, equity did maintain the discretionary
nature of the relief — examples where courts refused an injunction
order can be found throughout the law reports of this era.2
Today we are more apt to conceptualize “property” as an abstract
bundle of rights. The power of an owner to insist upon voluntary con-
sensual exchange as the only means of appropriation by another has
been truncated, particularly by legislation. For example, many crown
agencies and municipalities have a stat utory right of ex propriation th at
substitutes a fair market value for the lost property, with only limited
rights of objection accorded a property owner. Another important lim-
itation on the rights of an owner is that of usage through zoning and
other planning restrictions. Private restraints come through restrictive
covenants and even mortgage documents. With this level of encum-
brances on realty, it is perhaps not surprising to find that courts are
now reappraising the use of injunctions in this area, particularly with
respect to nuisance actions.
One of the main impediments to fashioning appropriate relief in
this area is the binary nature of injunctive relief. If the injunction is
denied then the court appears to be condoning a private right of ex-
propriation on the tortfeasor. On the other hand, if the injunction is
granted this may in fact inhibit an otherwise socially desirable activity.
To overcome this impediment, some courts have been willing to sus-
pend the operation of an injunction, thus both validating the property
holder’s claim as well as the reasonableness of the defendant’s activity.
Another approach has been to pay greater attention to the quantifica-
tion of damages — either in lieu of an injunction, or as common law
damages measured by a lost opportunity to bargain, or as restitution-
ary damages. Yet another response has been to tailor the terms of the
injunction by the inclusion of performance-type standards in an attempt
to accommodate competing uses of land.
B. INJUNCTIONS AND TRESPASS
Trespass is an act of direct inter ference with t he exclusive possession of
another person’s land, and an injunction has normally been granted in
vindication of the property owner’s exclusive rights. Thus, in Lewvest
2 See, for example, L eade r v.Moody (1875), L.R. 20 Eq. 145 (C.A.).
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
