Innovator Company v. Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FC 864
Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
Subject Matter | PRACTICE,COURTS,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW |
Citation | 2017 FC 864 |
Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
Date | 26 September 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Table of Cases
...290, 295, 298, 300, 306 Innovator Company v Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FC 548 , af’d 2017 FC 864 ...............................................................220 Janssen Inc v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 904 , af‘d 2021 FCA 137 ...................................................
-
The Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations
...of the PM(NOC) Regulations do not apply to its submission; see Innovator Company v Canada (Attorney General) , 2017 FC 548, af’d 2017 FC 864, and cases cited therein. 84 Merck & Co, Inc v Canada (Attorney General) , 2000 CanLII 15094 (FCA). 85 Above note 6. 86 AstraZeneca v Canada , above n......
-
Open Court Principle Means No Secret Proceedings If They Would Directly Affect A Competitor's Rights
...the manufacturer to provide its competitor with information about the proceeding. Case Innovator Company v Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FC 864 [Innovator IP Type Patents Summary In Innovator Company, a pharmaceutical manufacturer ("Innovator") filed a submission for regulatory approval o......
-
Open Court Principle Means No Secret Proceedings If They Would Directly Affect a Competitor's Rights
...the manufacturer to provide its competitor with information about the proceeding. Case Innovator Company v Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FC 864 [Innovator IP Type Patents Summary In Innovator Company, a pharmaceutical manufacturer (“Innovator”) filed a submission for regulatory approval o......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 firm's commentaries
-
Open Court Principle Means No Secret Proceedings If They Would Directly Affect A Competitor's Rights
...the manufacturer to provide its competitor with information about the proceeding. Case Innovator Company v Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FC 864 [Innovator IP Type Patents Summary In Innovator Company, a pharmaceutical manufacturer ("Innovator") filed a submission for regulatory approval o......
-
Open Court Principle Means No Secret Proceedings If They Would Directly Affect a Competitor's Rights
...the manufacturer to provide its competitor with information about the proceeding. Case Innovator Company v Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FC 864 [Innovator IP Type Patents Summary In Innovator Company, a pharmaceutical manufacturer (“Innovator”) filed a submission for regulatory approval o......
-
Federal Court confirms innovator must be named as respondent when PM(NOC) Regulations engaged
...a legal interest in the determination of the issue under review and must be notified. Case: Innovator Company v Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FC 864 (Court File No. T-485-17), affirming 2017 FC 548. Nature of case: Appeal of a prothonotary’s decision denying a motion for a confidentiality......
-
Intellectual Property Weekly Abstracts Bulletin Week Of October 2, 2017
...time. Appeal of order adjourning applicant's motion for confidentiality order dismissed Innovator Company v. Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FC 864 The Court dismissed the appeal of the Prothonotary's Order adjourning the Applicant's motion for a confidentiality order until after such time ......