Input Capital Corp. v Gustafson, 2019 SKCA 78
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Richards,Caldwell,Leurer |
| Citation | 2019 SKCA 78 |
| Docket Number | CACV3254 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Date | 16 August 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
Uber Technologies Inc. v. Heller, 2020 SCC 16
...Harry v. Kreutziger (1978), 9 B.C.L.R. 166 ; Downer v. Pitcher, 2017 NLCA 13 , 409 D.L.R. (4th) 542 ; Input Capital Corp. v. Gustafson, 2019 SKCA 78, 438 D.L.R. (4th) 387 ; Cain v. Clarica Life Insurance Co., 2005 ABCA 437 , 263 D.L.R. (4th) 368 ; Titus v. William F. Cooke Enterprises......
-
FRESH CONSIDERATION RULE: INSIGHTS FROM ITS RESURRECTION IN QUACH V MITRUX SERVICES LTD.
...(98) Lloyds Bank Ltd v Bundy, [1975] QB 326 (Eng CA) at 339. See also Pitcher, supra note 85 at para 17; Input Capital Corp v Gustafson, 2019 SKCA 78 at para 32. Note the nonuniform descriptive language (99) Harry, supra note 93 at para 29. (100) Denning LJ attempted to collapse unconsciona......
-
ATRIUM MORTGAGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION v. HEE JUNG KOH,
...That the Guarantee is unconscionable. In Input Capital Corp. v Gustafson, 2019 SKCA 78, 438 DLR (4th) 387 [Gustafson], Caldwell J.A. discussed the degree of inequality that must have arisen between the parties before unconscionability will be [35] In Hess v Thomas Estate, 2019 S......
-
GEORGE v. PENNER, 2020 SKQB 99
...1348623 Alberta Ltd. v Choubal, 2016 SKQB 200 (paras. 24 to 42); Input Capital Corp. v Gustafson, 2018 SKQB 154 (reversed on other grounds 2019 SKCA 78, [2020] 2 WWR 599); and Northrock Resources v ExxonMobil Canada Energy, 2018 SKQB 19, [2018] 3 WWR [21] This was not a highly difficult cas......
Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
-
Uber Technologies Inc. v. Heller, 2020 SCC 16
...Harry v. Kreutziger (1978), 9 B.C.L.R. 166 ; Downer v. Pitcher, 2017 NLCA 13 , 409 D.L.R. (4th) 542 ; Input Capital Corp. v. Gustafson, 2019 SKCA 78, 438 D.L.R. (4th) 387 ; Cain v. Clarica Life Insurance Co., 2005 ABCA 437 , 263 D.L.R. (4th) 368 ; Titus v. William F. Cooke Enterprises......
-
ATRIUM MORTGAGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION v. HEE JUNG KOH,
...That the Guarantee is unconscionable. In Input Capital Corp. v Gustafson, 2019 SKCA 78, 438 DLR (4th) 387 [Gustafson], Caldwell J.A. discussed the degree of inequality that must have arisen between the parties before unconscionability will be [35] In Hess v Thomas Estate, 2019 S......
-
GEORGE v. PENNER, 2020 SKQB 99
...1348623 Alberta Ltd. v Choubal, 2016 SKQB 200 (paras. 24 to 42); Input Capital Corp. v Gustafson, 2018 SKQB 154 (reversed on other grounds 2019 SKCA 78, [2020] 2 WWR 599); and Northrock Resources v ExxonMobil Canada Energy, 2018 SKQB 19, [2018] 3 WWR [21] This was not a highly difficult cas......
-
VLEEMING v. THOMAS, 2019 SKQB 213
... Recently, the Court of Appeal in Input Capital Corp. v Gustafson, 2019 SKCA 78 [Gustafson] overturned the trial judge’s decision that the contract was unconscionable. Caldwell J.A. 26 Overall, the combined Kreutziger [Harry v Kreutziger (1978), 95 DLR (3d) 231 (BCCA)] approach ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
FRESH CONSIDERATION RULE: INSIGHTS FROM ITS RESURRECTION IN QUACH V MITRUX SERVICES LTD.
...(98) Lloyds Bank Ltd v Bundy, [1975] QB 326 (Eng CA) at 339. See also Pitcher, supra note 85 at para 17; Input Capital Corp v Gustafson, 2019 SKCA 78 at para 32. Note the nonuniform descriptive language (99) Harry, supra note 93 at para 29. (100) Denning LJ attempted to collapse unconsciona......