Input Capital Corp. v Gustafson, 2019 SKCA 78

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeRichards,Caldwell,Leurer
Citation2019 SKCA 78
Docket NumberCACV3254
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
Date16 August 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 practice notes
  • Uber Technologies Inc. v. Heller, 2020 SCC 16
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • June 26, 2020
    ...Harry v. Kreutziger (1978), 9 B.C.L.R. 166 ; Downer v. Pitcher, 2017 NLCA 13 , 409 D.L.R. (4th) 542 ; Input Capital Corp. v. Gustafson, 2019 SKCA 78, 438 D.L.R. (4th) 387 ; Cain v. Clarica Life Insurance Co., 2005 ABCA 437 , 263 D.L.R. (4th) 368 ; Titus v. William F. Cooke Enterprises......
  • FRESH CONSIDERATION RULE: INSIGHTS FROM ITS RESURRECTION IN QUACH V MITRUX SERVICES LTD.
    • Canada
    • University of British Columbia Law Review Vol. 54 No. 2, September 2021
    • September 15, 2021
    ...(98) Lloyds Bank Ltd v Bundy, [1975] QB 326 (Eng CA) at 339. See also Pitcher, supra note 85 at para 17; Input Capital Corp v Gustafson, 2019 SKCA 78 at para 32. Note the nonuniform descriptive language (99) Harry, supra note 93 at para 29. (100) Denning LJ attempted to collapse unconsciona......
  • ATRIUM MORTGAGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION v. HEE JUNG KOH, 2021 SKQB 285
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • November 1, 2021
    ...That the Guarantee is unconscionable. In Input Capital Corp. v Gustafson, 2019 SKCA 78, 438 DLR (4th) 387 [Gustafson], Caldwell J.A. discussed the degree of inequality that must have arisen between the parties before unconscionability will be [35]   In Hess v Thomas Estate, 2019 S......
  • GEORGE v. PENNER, 2020 SKQB 99
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • April 3, 2020
    ...1348623 Alberta Ltd. v Choubal, 2016 SKQB 200 (paras. 24 to 42); Input Capital Corp. v Gustafson, 2018 SKQB 154 (reversed on other grounds 2019 SKCA 78, [2020] 2 WWR 599); and Northrock Resources v ExxonMobil Canada Energy, 2018 SKQB 19, [2018] 3 WWR [21] This was not a highly difficult cas......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
  • Uber Technologies Inc. v. Heller, 2020 SCC 16
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • June 26, 2020
    ...Harry v. Kreutziger (1978), 9 B.C.L.R. 166 ; Downer v. Pitcher, 2017 NLCA 13 , 409 D.L.R. (4th) 542 ; Input Capital Corp. v. Gustafson, 2019 SKCA 78, 438 D.L.R. (4th) 387 ; Cain v. Clarica Life Insurance Co., 2005 ABCA 437 , 263 D.L.R. (4th) 368 ; Titus v. William F. Cooke Enterprises......
  • ATRIUM MORTGAGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION v. HEE JUNG KOH, 2021 SKQB 285
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • November 1, 2021
    ...That the Guarantee is unconscionable. In Input Capital Corp. v Gustafson, 2019 SKCA 78, 438 DLR (4th) 387 [Gustafson], Caldwell J.A. discussed the degree of inequality that must have arisen between the parties before unconscionability will be [35]   In Hess v Thomas Estate, 2019 S......
  • GEORGE v. PENNER, 2020 SKQB 99
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • April 3, 2020
    ...1348623 Alberta Ltd. v Choubal, 2016 SKQB 200 (paras. 24 to 42); Input Capital Corp. v Gustafson, 2018 SKQB 154 (reversed on other grounds 2019 SKCA 78, [2020] 2 WWR 599); and Northrock Resources v ExxonMobil Canada Energy, 2018 SKQB 19, [2018] 3 WWR [21] This was not a highly difficult cas......
  • VLEEMING v. THOMAS, 2019 SKQB 213
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • August 27, 2019
    ... Recently, the Court of Appeal in Input Capital Corp. v Gustafson, 2019 SKCA 78 [Gustafson] overturned the trial judge’s decision that the contract was unconscionable. Caldwell J.A. 26 Overall, the combined Kreutziger [Harry v Kreutziger (1978), 95 DLR (3d) 231 (BCCA)] approach ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • FRESH CONSIDERATION RULE: INSIGHTS FROM ITS RESURRECTION IN QUACH V MITRUX SERVICES LTD.
    • Canada
    • University of British Columbia Law Review Vol. 54 No. 2, September 2021
    • September 15, 2021
    ...(98) Lloyds Bank Ltd v Bundy, [1975] QB 326 (Eng CA) at 339. See also Pitcher, supra note 85 at para 17; Input Capital Corp v Gustafson, 2019 SKCA 78 at para 32. Note the nonuniform descriptive language (99) Harry, supra note 93 at para 29. (100) Denning LJ attempted to collapse unconsciona......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT