Intact Insurance Company v. Malloy, 2020 NSCA 18
| Jurisdiction | Nova Scotia |
| Judge | Honourable Justice David P.S. Farrar |
| Citation | 2020 NSCA 18 |
| Docket Number | CA 488619 |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada) |
| Date | 28 February 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Mi’kmaw Family and Children’s Services v. Sipekne’katik,
...documents and not obscure theories or bald or boiler-plate assertions in pleadings. For example, in Intact Insurance Company v. Malloy, 2020 NSCA 18, at para. 35 Justice Farrar affirmed that even particularized pleadings must be supported by the evidence in order to avoid a fishing [35] ......
-
Sack v. Canada (Attorney General),
...based on scant evidence (if evidence is presented). Farrar, J.A. touched upon this issue in Intact Insurance Company v Malloy, 2020 NSCA 18 (“Intact”) when he wrote at paragraph Although the pleadings are a factor to be taken into consideration in determining whether doc......
-
Mike's Clothing Limited v. Kentville (Town),
...like a request for production, be supported by evidence, lest it amount to a fishing expedition: see Intact Insurance Company v. Malloy, 2020 NSCA 18 at paras.36-41. Allegations, no matter how specifically worded or drafted, which have no basis in the facts or the evidence without more, can......
-
Laybolt v. Irving Equipment Limited, 2020 NSSC 178
...interpretation of relevancy was most recently reiterated by the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal in Intact Insurance Company v. Malloy, 2020 NSCA 18. In Intact the Court said, that in light of the disclosure requirements under the Rules, a party seeking additional documentation must ......
4 cases
-
Mi’kmaw Family and Children’s Services v. Sipekne’katik,
...documents and not obscure theories or bald or boiler-plate assertions in pleadings. For example, in Intact Insurance Company v. Malloy, 2020 NSCA 18, at para. 35 Justice Farrar affirmed that even particularized pleadings must be supported by the evidence in order to avoid a fishing [35] ......
-
Sack v. Canada (Attorney General),
...based on scant evidence (if evidence is presented). Farrar, J.A. touched upon this issue in Intact Insurance Company v Malloy, 2020 NSCA 18 (“Intact”) when he wrote at paragraph Although the pleadings are a factor to be taken into consideration in determining whether doc......
-
Mike's Clothing Limited v. Kentville (Town),
...like a request for production, be supported by evidence, lest it amount to a fishing expedition: see Intact Insurance Company v. Malloy, 2020 NSCA 18 at paras.36-41. Allegations, no matter how specifically worded or drafted, which have no basis in the facts or the evidence without more, can......
-
Laybolt v. Irving Equipment Limited, 2020 NSSC 178
...interpretation of relevancy was most recently reiterated by the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal in Intact Insurance Company v. Malloy, 2020 NSCA 18. In Intact the Court said, that in light of the disclosure requirements under the Rules, a party seeking additional documentation must ......