Internet Child Exploitation Offences
Author | Lisa Joyal/Jennifer Gibson/Lisa Henderson/David Berg/Kasandra Cronin |
Pages | 223-295 |
Internet Child
Exploitation
Ofences
7
I. Introduction..............................................
II. Child Pornography Offences.................................
III. Voyeurism Offences .......................................
IV. Publishing an Intimate Image Without Consent .................
V. Luring a Child ............................................
VI. Agree or Arrange to Commit a Sexual Offence Against a Child .....
VII. Making Sexually Explicit Material Available to a Child.............
VIII. Cyberbullying.............................................
IX. Entrapment ..............................................
© [2023] Emond Montgomery Publications. All Rights Reserved.
Prosecuting and Defending Oences Against Children
I. Introduction
The sexual exploitation of children is not a new phenomenon, but advances in
technology have provided new ways and means for contacting and grooming chil-
dren, memorializing their abuse, and finding other like-minded persons with whom
to communicate and share. Internet child exploitation is a pervasive social problem
that affects the global community and its children.1 Crimes involving Internet child
exploitation can cause enduring, even lifelong, psychological harm, trauma, and suf-
fering.2 Children are victimized not only by being sexually exploited or abused; those
depicted in pornographic images are revictimized each time the images are viewed,
made available, and collected.
Parliament and the courts have been “on a learning curve” to comprehend and
address the increasing prevalence of Internet child exploitation offences.3 Mean-
while, Internet child exploitation cases continue to grow in number each year.
A recent Statistics Canada report notes that while many police-reported crimes
declined during the COVID-19 pandemic, the rate of police-reported child pornog-
raphy offences increased 31percent from 2019 to 2021 as children (and offenders)
were spending even more time online. This follows on the heels of a prior 47 percent
increase in the rate of offending, which has generally been trending upward at an
alarming pace since 2008.4
Child sexual exploitation offences involving telecommunications are among the
newest in the Criminal Code. When it comes to most other Criminal Code offence
provisions, the meaning of the language contained therein is well settled, and litigation
focuses instead on how the particular facts of a case fit into the settled law. By contrast,
the “oldest” Internet child exploitation offence (possession of child pornography) was
proclaimed in force in 1993 and has been amended numerous times in the interven-
ing years to expand the material that is covered and add new manners of offending in
respect to it, not to mention imposing and repeatedly raising both the maximum and
mandatory minimum sentences. The other Internet child exploitation offences were
proclaimed in 2002, 2006, 2012, and 2015. As a result, litigation is constantly address-
ing the meaning of the words and thus the definition of the offences. It is both frustrat-
ing and fascinating to deal with an area of law that is rapidly evolving, but this chapter
establishes a starting point. It is crucial to “note up” the cases mentioned herein to
keep track of the latest decisions marking evolutions or changes in the law.
1 R v Inksetter, 2018 ONCA 474 at para 22.
2 R v JS, 2018 ONCA 675 at para 121; R v Sharpe, 2001 SCC 2; R v Friesen, 2020 SCC 9.
3 R v DGF, 2010 ONCA 27 at para 21, cited with approval in R v Inksetter, supra note 1.
4 Statistics Canada, Online Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse in Canada: A Statistical Profile of
Police-Reported Incidents and Court Charges, 2014 to 2020, by Dyna Ibrahim, Juristat, Catalogue
No85-002-X (Ottawa: Statistics Canada, 12 May 2022), online: <https://www150.statcan.gc
.ca/n1/pub/85-002-x/2022001/article/00008-eng.htm>.
© [2023] Emond Montgomery Publications. All Rights Reserved.
Chapter Internet Child Exploitation Offences
Internet child exploitation offences essentially break down into two groups:
1. offences in respect of material that involves the sexual exploitation of children:
• possessing, accessing, making, and distributing child pornography,
• voyeurism, and
• non-consensual distribution of intimate images; and
2. offences aimed at halting the sexual exploitation of children, by criminalizing
the grooming process:
• child luring,
• agreement or arrangement to commit a sexual offence against a child, and
• making sexually explicit material available to a child.
While it is important to understand the legal boundaries of the offences, the com-
position of the material discovered, and the content of communications sent, those
issues are often not in dispute. The nature of computer-based offences is such that
while there is often a plethora of evidence of the offence, there is often no direct evi-
dence of the identity of the perpetrator. As a result, the triable issues tend to involve
proof of knowledge and control, or the legality of the investigation and search that led
to the discovery of the material.
This chapter explains each of the Internet child exploitation offences contained
in the Criminal Code, as well as common defences arising out of the prosecution of
these offences.
II. Child Pornography Oences
In 1993, Parliament enacted a number of offences relating to child pornography, which
are set out in section 163.1 of the Criminal Code. As the Supreme Court of Canada
observed in R v Sharpe,5 the section contains a comprehensive scheme to attack child
pornography at every stage—production, publication, importation, distribution, sale,
and possession.6 Section 163.1 contains the most frequently prosecuted Internet child
exploitation offences in the Criminal Code.
A. Dening Child Pornography
Section 163.1(1) of the Criminal Code states:
Definition ofchild pornography
163(1) In this section, child pornography means
(a) a photographic, film, video or other visual representation, whether or not it was
made by electronic or mechanical means,
5 Supra note 2.
6 Ibid at para 6.
© [2023] Emond Montgomery Publications. All Rights Reserved.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
