Iris Technologies Inc. v. Canada,

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeKarakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah; Kasirer, Nicholas; Jamal, Mahmud; O’Bonsawin, Michelle
Docket Number40346
Date28 June 2024
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Citation2024 SCC 24
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
10 practice notes
  • Dow Chemical Canada ULC v. Canada,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • June 28, 2024
    ... [2023] 4 C.T.C. 2049 ; Callahan v. The King, 2023 TCC 172 , [2024] 2 C.T.C. 2001 ; Iris Technologies Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2024 SCC 24; Canada (Attorney General) v. Iris Technologies Inc., 2022 FCA 101 , [2022] 1 F.C.R. 401 ; Canada v. Consumers’ Gas Co., [1987] 2 F.C. 60......
  • Trinity Global Support Foundation v. Canada (Attorney General),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 25, 2025
    ...6; Hunt v. Carey Canada Inc., [1990] 2 S.C.R. 959. [9] As stated by the Supreme Court of Canada in Iris Technologies Inc. v Canada, 2024 SCC 24 [Iris Technologies] (see also paragraph [26] There is no dispute on the proper test to be applied on a motion to strike in this context. A court se......
  • Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd. v. Canada (Health),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 6, 2024
    ...as they are taken as true for the purposes of a motion to strike (JP Morgan at para 52; see also Iris Technologies Inc v Canada, 2024 SCC 24 [Iris Technologies] at para [10] Exceptions to the rule should be permitted only where the justifications for the general rule of inadmissibility are ......
  • 3533158 Canada Inc. v. Canada (the Attorney General),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • July 11, 2024
    ...for relief. The jurisdiction of the TCC has been unclear on issues relating to the Minister’s discretion (Iris Technologies Inc. v Canada, 2024 SCC 24; Dow Chemical Canada ULC v Canada, 2024 SCC 23), and the TCC has even, in some cases, discussed the application of subsection 225(4) without......
  • Get Started for Free
10 cases
  • Dow Chemical Canada ULC v. Canada,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • June 28, 2024
    ... [2023] 4 C.T.C. 2049 ; Callahan v. The King, 2023 TCC 172 , [2024] 2 C.T.C. 2001 ; Iris Technologies Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2024 SCC 24; Canada (Attorney General) v. Iris Technologies Inc., 2022 FCA 101 , [2022] 1 F.C.R. 401 ; Canada v. Consumers’ Gas Co., [1987] 2 F.C. 60......
  • Trinity Global Support Foundation v. Canada (Attorney General),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 25, 2025
    ...6; Hunt v. Carey Canada Inc., [1990] 2 S.C.R. 959. [9] As stated by the Supreme Court of Canada in Iris Technologies Inc. v Canada, 2024 SCC 24 [Iris Technologies] (see also paragraph [26] There is no dispute on the proper test to be applied on a motion to strike in this context. A court se......
  • Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd. v. Canada (Health),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 6, 2024
    ...as they are taken as true for the purposes of a motion to strike (JP Morgan at para 52; see also Iris Technologies Inc v Canada, 2024 SCC 24 [Iris Technologies] at para [10] Exceptions to the rule should be permitted only where the justifications for the general rule of inadmissibility are ......
  • 3533158 Canada Inc. v. Canada (the Attorney General),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • July 11, 2024
    ...for relief. The jurisdiction of the TCC has been unclear on issues relating to the Minister’s discretion (Iris Technologies Inc. v Canada, 2024 SCC 24; Dow Chemical Canada ULC v Canada, 2024 SCC 23), and the TCC has even, in some cases, discussed the application of subsection 225(4) without......
  • Get Started for Free