J.H. v. A.C., 2020 NSCA 54

JurisdictionNova Scotia
JudgeDerrick, J.A.
Citation2020 NSCA 54
Docket NumberCA 499095
CourtCourt of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
Date17 August 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • 25 Julio 2022
    ...13019. 201 See s 18(H)(1) of the Parenting and Support Act, RSNS 1989, c 160 as amended and see DAM v CJB, 2017 NSCA 91; JH v AC, 2020 NSCA 54; MacDonald v McNeil, 2021 NSSC 11; Harris v Curtis, 2021 NSCA 10; NS v JB, 2021 NSSC 141; MacDonald v Padelt-Robinson, 2021 NSSC 258. 202 See RAP v ......
  • Remedies Available Under Provincial and Territorial Legislation
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • 25 Julio 2022
    ...2018 NSFC 14; Woodrow v Drover, 2019 NSSC 141; Head v Brown, 2019 NSSC 213; JEW v WED, 2019 NSSC 141; SLJ v KB, 2019 NSSC 268; JH v AC, 2020 NSCA 54. Chapter 12: Remedies Available Under Provincial and Territorial legislation in Alberta,59 New Brunswick,60 Ontario,61 Prince Edward Island,62......
  • Green v. Green,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 9 Febrero 2021
    ...necessity of a stay takes place against the backdrop of a more foundational consideration. As discussed by Derrick J.A. in J.H. v. A.C., 2020 NSCA 54: [18] However, the “Fulton” criteria are not the focus in a case involving children. The focus there is on the children’s best interests. The......
  • Titus v. Kynock,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 27 Agosto 2021
    ...appeal reflect the overlay of best interests into the Purdy v. Fulton test. [43]      Later, in J.H. v. A.C., 2020 NSCA 54, Derrick J.A. [18]     However, the “Fulton” criteria are not the focus in a case involving children. The foc......
2 cases
  • Green v. Green,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 9 Febrero 2021
    ...necessity of a stay takes place against the backdrop of a more foundational consideration. As discussed by Derrick J.A. in J.H. v. A.C., 2020 NSCA 54: [18] However, the “Fulton” criteria are not the focus in a case involving children. The focus there is on the children’s best interests. The......
  • Titus v. Kynock,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 27 Agosto 2021
    ...appeal reflect the overlay of best interests into the Purdy v. Fulton test. [43]      Later, in J.H. v. A.C., 2020 NSCA 54, Derrick J.A. [18]     However, the “Fulton” criteria are not the focus in a case involving children. The foc......
2 books & journal articles
  • Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • 25 Julio 2022
    ...13019. 201 See s 18(H)(1) of the Parenting and Support Act, RSNS 1989, c 160 as amended and see DAM v CJB, 2017 NSCA 91; JH v AC, 2020 NSCA 54; MacDonald v McNeil, 2021 NSSC 11; Harris v Curtis, 2021 NSCA 10; NS v JB, 2021 NSSC 141; MacDonald v Padelt-Robinson, 2021 NSSC 258. 202 See RAP v ......
  • Remedies Available Under Provincial and Territorial Legislation
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • 25 Julio 2022
    ...2018 NSFC 14; Woodrow v Drover, 2019 NSSC 141; Head v Brown, 2019 NSSC 213; JEW v WED, 2019 NSSC 141; SLJ v KB, 2019 NSSC 268; JH v AC, 2020 NSCA 54. Chapter 12: Remedies Available Under Provincial and Territorial legislation in Alberta,59 New Brunswick,60 Ontario,61 Prince Edward Island,62......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT