J.S. et al. v. Nunavut (Minister of Health and Social Services) et al., 2006 NUCJ 1

JudgeJohnson, J.
CourtNunavut Court of Justice (Canada)
Case DateFebruary 02, 2006
JurisdictionNunavut
Citations2006 NUCJ 1;[2006] Nunavut Cases 1 (CJ)

J.S. v. Nunavut, [2006] Nunavut Cases 1 (CJ)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2006] Nunavut Cases TBEd. FE.034

J.S., by his Litigation Guardian, P.S, P.S. and R.S. (applicants) v. The Government of Nunavut as represented by the Minister of Health and Social Services and by the Minister of Education (respondents)

(08-05-528CHL; 2006 NUCJ 1)

Indexed As: J.S. et al. v. Nunavut (Minister of Health and Social Services) et al.

Nunavut Court of Justice

Iqaluit

Johnson, J.

February 10, 2006.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Editor's note: Certain names in the following case have been initialized or the case otherwise edited to prevent the disclosure of identities where required by law, publication ban, Maritime Law Book's editorial policy or otherwise.

Government Programs - Topic 5243

Health and social services - Handicapped or special needs persons - Funding for services - See paragraphs 1 to 61.

Government Programs - Topic 5245

Health and social services - Handicapped or special needs persons - Funding for therapy - See paragraphs 1 to 61.

Injunctions - Topic 1609

Interlocutory or interim injunctions - General principles - Circumstances when injunction will issue - See paragraphs 1 to 61.

Cases Noticed:

RJR-MacDonald Inc. et Imperial Tobacco Ltd. v. Canada (Procureur général), [1994] 1 S.C.R. 311; 164 N.R. 1; 60 Q.A.C. 241; 1994 CanLII 117, refd to. [para. 39].

D.M. et al. v. Board of Education of Regina Roman Catholic Separate School Division No. 81 (1994), 128 Sask.R. 206; 85 W.A.C. 206; 1994 CarswellSask 397 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 40].

J.M. v. Regina Roman Catholic Separate School Division No. 81 - see D.M. et al. v. Board of Education of Regina Roman Catholic Separate School Division No. 81.

M.P. et al. v. Chinook Regional Health Authority et al. (2004), 347 A.R. 302; 2004 CarswellAlta 42; 2004 ABQB 10, refd to. [para. 40].

Naccarato v. Ontario, [2004] O.T.C. 693; 2004 CanLII 6328 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 42].

Thomas v. Ontario, [2004] O.T.C. 714; 2004 CanLII 6250 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 43].

Clough v. Ontario, 2003 CarswellOnt 2329 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 43].

Bettencourt v. Ontario, [2005] O.T.C. 16; 2005 CanLII 462 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 55].

Lowrey v. Ontario, [2003] O.T.C. 295; 2003 CanLII 2436 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 55].

Counsel:

The applicants were self-represented;

Sheila MacPherson, for the respondents;

Faisal Bhabha, amicus curiae.

This application was heard on February 2, 2006, by Johnson, J., of the Nunavut Court of Justice, who released the following judgment on February 10, 2006.

Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 practice notes
  • Canada (Attorney General) v. Nunavut Tunngavik Inc., 2008 NUCJ 15
    • Canada
    • Nunavut Court of Justice (Canada)
    • 20 Mayo 2008
    ...which they follow with respect to interlocutory injunctions." [23] In S. (J.) (Litigation Guardian of) v. Nunavut, 2006 NUCJ 01, 2006 NUCJ 1 (CanLII), I applied the three-part test from RJR-MacDonald, stating: "[39] Both counsel relied on RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), [19......
1 cases
  • Canada (Attorney General) v. Nunavut Tunngavik Inc., 2008 NUCJ 15
    • Canada
    • Nunavut Court of Justice (Canada)
    • 20 Mayo 2008
    ...which they follow with respect to interlocutory injunctions." [23] In S. (J.) (Litigation Guardian of) v. Nunavut, 2006 NUCJ 01, 2006 NUCJ 1 (CanLII), I applied the three-part test from RJR-MacDonald, stating: "[39] Both counsel relied on RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), [19......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT