Jacobs v. Jacobs, 2015 BCSC 94
Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
Judge | Ross, J. |
Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
Subject Matter | PRACTICE,FAMILY LAW |
Citation | 2015 BCSC 94,[2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 94,[2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 94 (SC) |
Date | 23 January 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Jacinto v. Mariano, 2020 BCSC 1990
...disability that has arisen since then: Lewis v. Lewis, [1999] B.C.J. No. 2537; P.L. v. J.D.L., 2013 BCSC 1492; Jacobs v. Jacobs, 2015 BCSC 94. [24] In their place, I am ordering that the parties will be joint guardians of Chad, with Ms. Barcelon having pr......
-
MacLean v. Mio, 2019 BCSC 375
...under s. 17 of the Divorce Act: Earle v. Earle, 1999 BCSC 283 at para. 23; S.A.R. v. L.G.R., 2011 BCSC 712 at para. 45; Jacobs v. Jacobs, 2015 BCSC 94 at paras. 29-30, application to extend time to appeal refused 2015 BCCA [92] The policy underlying the onerous test for cancelling arrears i......
-
Jacobs v. Jacobs, [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 671
...was not the $75,000 set out in Bowden J.'s order. [15] Ross J.'s reasons for judgment on the two applications may be found at 2015 BCSC 94. It is sufficient here to report that Ross J. held that neither Mr. Jacobs nor Ms. Jacobs established that a material change had occurred such......
3 cases
-
Jacinto v. Mariano, 2020 BCSC 1990
...disability that has arisen since then: Lewis v. Lewis, [1999] B.C.J. No. 2537; P.L. v. J.D.L., 2013 BCSC 1492; Jacobs v. Jacobs, 2015 BCSC 94. [24] In their place, I am ordering that the parties will be joint guardians of Chad, with Ms. Barcelon having pr......
-
MacLean v. Mio, 2019 BCSC 375
...under s. 17 of the Divorce Act: Earle v. Earle, 1999 BCSC 283 at para. 23; S.A.R. v. L.G.R., 2011 BCSC 712 at para. 45; Jacobs v. Jacobs, 2015 BCSC 94 at paras. 29-30, application to extend time to appeal refused 2015 BCCA [92] The policy underlying the onerous test for cancelling arrears i......
-
Jacobs v. Jacobs, [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 671
...was not the $75,000 set out in Bowden J.'s order. [15] Ross J.'s reasons for judgment on the two applications may be found at 2015 BCSC 94. It is sufficient here to report that Ross J. held that neither Mr. Jacobs nor Ms. Jacobs established that a material change had occurred such......