Jamali v. Gillani,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Honourable Madam Justice C. Ross |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 BCSC 2134 |
| Citation | 2021 BCSC 2134 |
| Date | 02 November 2021 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Docket Number | E210075 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 practice notes
-
Zaidi v Zia
...defeat the legislative objective of discouraging child abductions of very young children (paras. 93–94; see also Jamali v. Gillani, 2021 BCSC 2134, at para. 101 (CanLII)). In order to deter and remedy child abductions effectively, courts should be prepared, in some circumstances, to order t......
-
2025 BCSC 1658
...a consent order. The onus of proof of duress or coercion in relation to consent orders is on the party who alleges it: Jamali v Gillani, 2021 BCSC 2134, para. 78 I find that Ms. Lukas has not discharged her burden to demonstrate that she was under duress or coerced into agreeing to the Caym......
-
Lukas v Lemos
...a consent order. The onus of proof of duress or coercion in relation to consent orders is on the party who alleges it: Jamali v Gillani, 2021 BCSC 2134, para. 78 I find that Ms. Lukas has not discharged her burden to demonstrate that she was under duress or coerced into agreeing to the Caym......
2 cases
-
Zaidi v Zia
...defeat the legislative objective of discouraging child abductions of very young children (paras. 93–94; see also Jamali v. Gillani, 2021 BCSC 2134, at para. 101 (CanLII)). In order to deter and remedy child abductions effectively, courts should be prepared, in some circumstances, to order t......
-
Lukas v Lemos
...a consent order. The onus of proof of duress or coercion in relation to consent orders is on the party who alleges it: Jamali v Gillani, 2021 BCSC 2134, para. 78 I find that Ms. Lukas has not discharged her burden to demonstrate that she was under duress or coerced into agreeing to the Caym......