Jamali v. Gillani
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Judge | Honourable Madam Justice C. Ross |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 BCSC 2134 |
| Citation | 2021 BCSC 2134 |
| Docket Number | E210075 |
| Date | 02 November 2021 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 practice notes
-
F. v. N.
...(8th) 113; Barendregt v. Grebliunas, 2022 SCC 22; B.J.T. v. J.D., 2022 SCC 24; Gordon v. Goertz, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 27; Jamali v. Gillani, 2021 BCSC 2134; Re A. (A Minor) (Abduction), [1988] 1 F.L.R. 365; S.A.G. v. C.D.G., 2009 YKSC 21; Hage v. Bryntwick, 2014 ONSC 4104; P. (J.) v. P. (T.N.), ......
-
Zaidi v. Zia
...defeat the legislative objective of discouraging child abductions of very young children (paras. 93-94; see also Jamali v. Gillani, 2021 BCSC 2134, at para. 101 (CanLII)). In order to deter and remedy child abductions effectively, courts should be prepared, in some circumstances, to order t......
-
Raj v. Seroya
...despite a risk of separation from their primary caregiver to deter and remedy child abductions. As stated in Jamali v. Gillani, 2021 BCSC 2134, at para. 101, to decide otherwise, “could allow abducting parents, in some situations, to rely on their status as primary caregivers to circu......
