James v. James, 2018 BCSC 603
Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Betton |
Citation | 2018 BCSC 603 |
Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
Docket Number | 107136 |
Date | 16 April 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Safdari v. Buckland, 2020 BCSC 769
...the time frames involved, I am satisfied that an in-trust award of $5,000 is appropriate in the circumstances. See also James v. James, 2018 BCSC 603 at paras. 148-149, wherein Justice Betton confirms that the in-trust award for past care must be reasonable. [221] I am satisfied that Mr. Sa......
-
Sidhu v. Hiebert,
...tailoring them to the circumstances of the individual case by making adjustments that incorporate relevant contingencies: James v. James, 2018 BCSC 603 at paras. 57-60. [670] They submit that as a principled approach to the Court’s assessment of life expectancy......
-
Gustafson v. MacFarlane,
...cost that would have been incurred if family members were not involved. The cases are O’Connell BCCA, and James v. James, 2018 BCSC 603. [91] In O’Connell, the plaintiff was a 58-year-old woman who had suffered a brain injury. As......
-
Uy v. Dhillon, 2020 BCSC 1302
...care clients and Mr. Amurao missed overtime opportunities at work, before he went on disability leave. [123] Mr. Uy cites James v. James, 2018 BCSC 603, where the court used a daily rate approach to calculate the value of services provided by a husband to the plaintiff, who had been rendere......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
Safdari v. Buckland, 2020 BCSC 769
...the time frames involved, I am satisfied that an in-trust award of $5,000 is appropriate in the circumstances. See also James v. James, 2018 BCSC 603 at paras. 148-149, wherein Justice Betton confirms that the in-trust award for past care must be reasonable. [221] I am satisfied that Mr. Sa......
-
Sidhu v. Hiebert,
...tailoring them to the circumstances of the individual case by making adjustments that incorporate relevant contingencies: James v. James, 2018 BCSC 603 at paras. 57-60. [670] They submit that as a principled approach to the Court’s assessment of life expectancy......
-
Gustafson v. MacFarlane,
...cost that would have been incurred if family members were not involved. The cases are O’Connell BCCA, and James v. James, 2018 BCSC 603. [91] In O’Connell, the plaintiff was a 58-year-old woman who had suffered a brain injury. As......
-
Uy v. Dhillon, 2020 BCSC 1302
...care clients and Mr. Amurao missed overtime opportunities at work, before he went on disability leave. [123] Mr. Uy cites James v. James, 2018 BCSC 603, where the court used a daily rate approach to calculate the value of services provided by a husband to the plaintiff, who had been rendere......
Request a trial to view additional results