Jane Doe v. Weinstein

JurisdictionOntario
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
JudgeP. J. Monahan J.
Citation2018 ONSC 1126
Docket NumberCV-17-585459
Date16 February 2018

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
8 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 4, 2022 ' April 8, 2022)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 11 Abril 2022
    ...Summary Judgment, Striking Pleadings, Limitation Periods, Limitations Act, 2002, S.O. 2002 c. 24, Sch. B., s. 16, Jane Doe v. Weinstein, 2018 ONSC 1126 Goguen v. Baptiste, 2022 ONCA 284 Keywords: Civil Procedure, Mareva Injunctions, Jurisdiction, Chevron Corp. v. Yaiguaje, 2015 SCC 42 Riede......
  • Barker v. Barker
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 25 Junio 2020
    ...both the plain words of s. 16(1.3) and this court’s decision in Weinstein. Section 16(1.3). [1300]  In Jane Doe v Weinstein, 2018 ONSC 1126, at para 23-27, the court held that these subsections of section 16 of the Limitations Act, 2002 are remedial, addressing a broad range of ......
  • Deluca v. Bucciarelli
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 11 Enero 2021
    ...that this case involves a matter of public interest.  Nor do I accept the plaintiff’s submission that Jane Doe v. Weinstein, 2018 ONSC 1126, stands for the proposition that every case involving an allegation of sexual harassment or assault is a case of broader public interest. [......
  • Deluca v. Bucciarelli
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 11 Enero 2022
    ...that this case involves a matter of public interest.  Nor do I accept the plaintiff’s submission that Jane Doe v. Weinstein, 2018 ONSC 1126, stands for the proposition that every case involving an allegation of sexual harassment or assault is a case of broader public interest. [......
  • Get Started for Free
5 cases
  • Barker v. Barker
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 25 Junio 2020
    ...both the plain words of s. 16(1.3) and this court’s decision in Weinstein. Section 16(1.3). [1300]  In Jane Doe v Weinstein, 2018 ONSC 1126, at para 23-27, the court held that these subsections of section 16 of the Limitations Act, 2002 are remedial, addressing a broad range of ......
  • Deluca v. Bucciarelli
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 11 Enero 2021
    ...that this case involves a matter of public interest.  Nor do I accept the plaintiff’s submission that Jane Doe v. Weinstein, 2018 ONSC 1126, stands for the proposition that every case involving an allegation of sexual harassment or assault is a case of broader public interest. [......
  • Deluca v. Bucciarelli
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 11 Enero 2022
    ...that this case involves a matter of public interest.  Nor do I accept the plaintiff’s submission that Jane Doe v. Weinstein, 2018 ONSC 1126, stands for the proposition that every case involving an allegation of sexual harassment or assault is a case of broader public interest. [......
  • X.H. v. Cota
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 6 Abril 2022
    ...This argument proceeds from a misreading of the decision in Jane Doe v. Weinstein, 2018 ONSC 1126 and of s. 16(1.3), which (1.3) For greater certainty, clauses (1)(h), (h.1) and (h.2) are not limited in any way with respect to the claims that may be made in the proceeding in relation to the......
  • Get Started for Free
3 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 4, 2022 ' April 8, 2022)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 11 Abril 2022
    ...Summary Judgment, Striking Pleadings, Limitation Periods, Limitations Act, 2002, S.O. 2002 c. 24, Sch. B., s. 16, Jane Doe v. Weinstein, 2018 ONSC 1126 Goguen v. Baptiste, 2022 ONCA 284 Keywords: Civil Procedure, Mareva Injunctions, Jurisdiction, Chevron Corp. v. Yaiguaje, 2015 SCC 42 Riede......
  • School Board Held Liable For Historical Sexual Abuse Of Student
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 4 Noviembre 2020
    ...Ibid at para 41. 4 Ibid at para 46. 5 Ibid at para 41m. 6 Limitations Act, SO 2002, c 24, s 16(1)(h) and (h.1). 7 Jane Doe v. Weinstein, 2018 ONSC 1126 8 Bill 48, The Safe and Supportive Classrooms Act, 1st Sess, 42nd Leg, 2019, Ontario, 2019 (assented to 3 April, 2019). The content of this......
  • Class Actions In Canada—Part 3: Sexual Harassment And Discrimination Class Actions
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 23 Abril 2018
    ...awareness and understanding of workplace policies and the steps that exist for resolving complaints. Footnotes 1 Jane Doe v. Weinstein, 2018 ONSC 1126, para. 2 Wal-Mart faced a claim that its "corporate culture of sex discrimination" affected every female employee as managerial discretion i......