Jimenez v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2018 FC 1225

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Citation2018 FC 1225
Date06 December 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Bashir v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1441
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 21, 2022
    ...City. This was an entirely reasonable determination on the record before it: see Jimenez v Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2018 FC 1225 at paras 14-22. [19] The applicants contend that the RAD erred by failing to consider that the police officer could lay a fabricated crimin......
  • Asana v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1776
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 20, 2022
    ...Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 640 at paras 10-11; Jimenez v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1225 at paras 15-16; Kassim v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 621 at para 22. The RAD considered the evidence—in......
  • Pecaj v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1032
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • May 25, 2020
    ...he or she is considered generally credible, or if credibility is not at issue: Jimenez v Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2018 FC 1225 at paras 19–20. [15]  Mr. Pecaj further submits that the RAD unreasonably adopted the RPD’s finding on state protection in......
  • Barkat v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 211
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 20, 2019
    ...(Kayumba v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2010 FC 138 at paras 12–13; Jimenez v Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2018 FC 1225 at para 9). [8] The Applicants submit that the RPD erred under both prongs of the IFA test and that its determination that the Applicants have ......
4 cases
  • Bashir v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1441
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 21, 2022
    ...City. This was an entirely reasonable determination on the record before it: see Jimenez v Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2018 FC 1225 at paras 14-22. [19] The applicants contend that the RAD erred by failing to consider that the police officer could lay a fabricated crimin......
  • Asana v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1776
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 20, 2022
    ...Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 640 at paras 10-11; Jimenez v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1225 at paras 15-16; Kassim v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 621 at para 22. The RAD considered the evidence—in......
  • Pecaj v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1032
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • May 25, 2020
    ...he or she is considered generally credible, or if credibility is not at issue: Jimenez v Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2018 FC 1225 at paras 19–20. [15]  Mr. Pecaj further submits that the RAD unreasonably adopted the RPD’s finding on state protection in......
  • Barkat v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 211
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 20, 2019
    ...(Kayumba v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2010 FC 138 at paras 12–13; Jimenez v Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2018 FC 1225 at para 9). [8] The Applicants submit that the RPD erred under both prongs of the IFA test and that its determination that the Applicants have ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT