Jin v. Ren, 2016 ABCA 80
| Judge | Berger, Veldhuis and Schutz, JJ.A. |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Case Date | Tuesday March 22, 2016 |
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Citations | 2016 ABCA 80;[2016] A.R. Uned. 45;[2016] A.R. Uned. 45 (CA) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 practice notes
-
Dow Chemical Canada ULC v NOVA Chemicals Corporation
...ABCA 20; 1081748 Alberta Ltd v Enervest Resource Management Ltd, 2008 ABQB 793 at paras 62-67; Jin v Ren, 2015 ABQB 115 at para 108, aff’d 2016 ABCA 80, leave to appeal to SCC refused 37023 (October 13, 2016); Alpine Canada Alpin v Non-Marine Underwriters, 1999 ABQB 454 at para [1178] In ne......
-
R. v Gardiner, 2018 ABCA 298
...as here; see R v Dinardo, 2008 SCC 24 at para 32, [2008] 1 SCR 788; R v REM, 2008 SCC 51 at paras 24-25, [2008] 2 SCR 3 [REM]; R v Walsh, 2016 ABCA 80 at paras 11, 24-25. In such a case, a trial judge’s decision cannot be faulted simply for failing to recite each of these factors, and the n......
-
Hugo v Ewashko, 2022 ABCA 110
...[29] Third, issues related to trial fairness generally raise questions of law: Ren v Jin, 2016 ABCA 80 at para 27. This is the case irrespective of whether the decision was discretionary; discretionary powers must always be exercised judicially and ......
-
Hansen v White, 2021 ABPC 187
...be more convenient. [39] Mr. Gilroy relied on the decisions in Jin v Ren, 2015 ABQB 115, (affd. 2016 ABCA 80) (Jin v Ren), where the Court held that the arrangement between the parties was so vague and uncertain no contract could be said to have eve......
4 cases
-
Dow Chemical Canada ULC v NOVA Chemicals Corporation,
...ABCA 20; 1081748 Alberta Ltd v Enervest Resource Management Ltd, 2008 ABQB 793 at paras 62-67; Jin v Ren, 2015 ABQB 115 at para 108, aff’d 2016 ABCA 80, leave to appeal to SCC refused 37023 (October 13, 2016); Alpine Canada Alpin v Non-Marine Underwriters, 1999 ABQB 454 at para [1178] In ne......
-
R. v Gardiner, 2018 ABCA 298
...as here; see R v Dinardo, 2008 SCC 24 at para 32, [2008] 1 SCR 788; R v REM, 2008 SCC 51 at paras 24-25, [2008] 2 SCR 3 [REM]; R v Walsh, 2016 ABCA 80 at paras 11, 24-25. In such a case, a trial judge’s decision cannot be faulted simply for failing to recite each of these factors, and the n......
-
Hugo v Ewashko, 2022 ABCA 110
...[29] Third, issues related to trial fairness generally raise questions of law: Ren v Jin, 2016 ABCA 80 at para 27. This is the case irrespective of whether the decision was discretionary; discretionary powers must always be exercised judicially and ......
-
Hansen v White, 2021 ABPC 187
...be more convenient. [39] Mr. Gilroy relied on the decisions in Jin v Ren, 2015 ABQB 115, (affd. 2016 ABCA 80) (Jin v Ren), where the Court held that the arrangement between the parties was so vague and uncertain no contract could be said to have eve......